On 14 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked Martin to explain how to do this on the rsync web page or better yet
> put a prompt for it there but he hasn't said he would or not.
Right, we should do that.
Pipermail is not ideal. I particularly hate the way it splits up
thre
> No, I don't think so because rsync clients don't even call bind(); rsh does
> that. The only time rsync calls bind() is when it is running as a --daemon
> in the background (not from inetd.conf).
Dave,
That makes sense to me. Thanks.
sri
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 02:03:04PM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
> > No, I really don't see how it would be possible for rsync to print that
> > error. I also see no occurrences of the string "bind:" or "bytes :".
>
> I agree that it's not rsync source thats causing the problem, but something in
> No, I really don't see how it would be possible for rsync to print that
> error. I also see no occurrences of the string "bind:" or "bytes :".
I agree that it's not rsync source thats causing the problem, but something in
the rsync code calls a system call that calls the one thats failing? Do
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:38:10PM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:20:18PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:01:31AM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
> > >
> > > [I wish the list archives were searchable, this most likely is a repeat
> > > question]
>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:01:31AM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
>
> [I wish the list archives were searchable, this most likely is a repeat
> question]
You can use google to search using the keywords
site:lists.samba.org rsync keys_to_search_for
> We have a set of cron jobs that do regular
I noticed we're not checking for a failure to fork() in socket.c. This
patch should address the problem.
Index: socket.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/socket.c,v
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -u -r1.54 socket.c
--- socket.c
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:20:18PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:01:31AM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
> >
> > [I wish the list archives were searchable, this most likely is a repeat
> > question]
>
> You can use google to search using the keywords
> site:lists.samba
> [I wish the list archives were searchable, this most likely
> is a repeat question]
I don't know if it *is* a repeat question or not, but the archives *are*
searchable, here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=rsync&r=1&w=2
Daemian Mack
Next week are going to start using rsync "live" to mirror our primary and
secondary web servers. I am still trying to iron out a couple of bugs, any
help would be much apprecitated.
Here is my rsync.conf file on my primary web server
use chroot = no
max connections =
Is there a site doing current builds of Win32 binaries?
Also, is there any project working in a non cygwin port of rsync?
Thanks!
[I wish the list archives were searchable, this most likely is a repeat
question]
We have a set of cron jobs that do regular rsyncs mirroring two trees. This
has been pretty stable. Over the weekend, almost all of them broke with this
message:
rresvport: bind: Permission denied
(15728) Error
Thanks for the info but I don't think my connection is getting dropped.
I have my modem speaker turned on, and know when it redials.
I can ping, http, ssh or scp after/while the rsync fails.
-Stephen More
At 10:27 AM 1/14/02 -0500, Thomas Lambert wrote:
>I'm not an rsync guru, but it sounds li
I'm not an rsync guru, but it sounds like your dialup connection is
getting dropped. You might have your dialup settings to disconnect
after some time of inactivity. I found that M$ doesn't check ALL
traffic, just IE,email and ???. My ftp utility was giving me the same
sort of error till I t
I am trying to rsync a handful of directories between Solaris and Cygwin
over a dialup line. Both are running version rsync 2.5.1 with ssh.
Most of the directories work fine, except one of the same directories fails
every time with this error:
Read from remote host X.X.X.X: Connection reset by
Make fails with "make: fatal error: line 65: Syntax error." when building on a
Fujitsu VPP system (system_V). Make doesn't like the continuation to a blank
line for LIBOBJ.
Distribution version:
LIBOBJ=lib/fnmatch.o lib/compat.o lib/snprintf.o lib/mdfour.o \
lib/permstring.o \
ZLIBOBJ=z
whats wrong with CVS anyway?
It's quite annoying to learn another SCM package for every project you
want to work on.
IMHO it's wasted developer time.
Mark
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:30:00PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> This looks like too much pain to justify the switch at the moment.
> I'm go
17 matches
Mail list logo
