On 6 Dec 2001, Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will also pound a little bit more on the rsync+ bits. Two more small nits:
>
> rsync.1: -f, --read-batch=FILE read batch file
> rsync.yo: -f, --read-batch=FILE read batch file
>
> Here, FILE should be EXT, as it specifies the
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 06:40:22PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> You can get that behaviour by using --dry-run first to see if the
> proposed modifications are reasonable. If you discover any bugs that
> cause --dry-run not to be accurate then please report them.
There are. I hope to come up with
On 20 Dec 2001, "Mack, Daemian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The question is, why does it work? Are you indeed copying
> > between two NTFS
> > filesystems, with rsync running under Windows & cygwin on
> > both sides? I
> > would have thought that would result in matching timestamps
> > gra
On 22 Dec 2001, Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am on a developpers list for mandrake: cooker@ and the rsync-servers
> broke which resulted in a lot of very unhappy people cause their rsync
> directories got empied.
Sorry about that...
rsync should never delete local files just because the s
Dave Dykstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:45:59PM -0600, John Malmberg wrote:
>
>>Compaq C 6.5
>>OpenVMS Alpha 7.3
>>
> ...
>
>>A second issue, is the line:
>>
>>#undef socklen_t
>>
>>It is not in the standard format for the other lines in the configure
>>script.
>>
>>It wou
Rsync is great. (What is cp? What is tar? Since I started using rsync I
forgot how to use those tools.) I sync over 1,000,000 files (50G) to
multiple destinations every day. Over medium speed links it takes about
3 hrs.
The default mode of operation creates a hidden (.file) on the
destination w
This is a simple question. How much file system
overhead is there with this system? Is it only as large as the largest file
transfered or could you potentially (even if configured correctly) end up with
double what you started out with on the sending or receiving end?
The reason I need to
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 17:29, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Isn't there some solution that doesn't have to explicitly list every
> variable name? I think that's asking for future bugs; just because there's
> an instruction in a comment doesn't mean people will remember to do what
> it says when they add a
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 02:07:06AM -0800, Chris Cogdon wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I'm in desperate need of getting the '--force' option working. I've
> > written a jitterbug entry on this already #3500
> >
> > Just curious to know if this is alr
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:45:59PM -0600, John Malmberg wrote:
> Compaq C 6.5
> OpenVMS Alpha 7.3
...
> A second issue, is the line:
>
> #undef socklen_t
>
> It is not in the standard format for the other lines in the configure
> script.
>
> It would be helpful for it to be:
>
> #undef HAVE_S
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 09:36:23PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-01-01 at 19:45, John Malmberg wrote:
> >
> > The config.h.in template file is missing the line:
> >
> > #undef HAVE_INET_NTOP
>
> At least this one is fixed in rsync CVS, as I discovered when I ran into
> the same bug
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 05:32:28AM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
> How secure is "hosts allow"?
It's not.
> I have "hosts allow = bkup" in my rsyncd.conf. Then in /etc/hosts I have:
>
> 64.29.16.235 bkup
>
> This makes only 64.29.16.235 able to connect to rsync.
>
> Could someone spoof their host
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 04:15:37AM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
> With the following rsync settings:
>
> cd /home/lina_backup
> rsync -R -v -z -rlptgo --delete \
> --password-file=password \
> --include-from=include --exclude="*" \
> --backup --backup-dir=./`date -d yesterday +%Y-%m-%d` \
> r
Isn't there some solution that doesn't have to explicitly list every
variable name? I think that's asking for future bugs; just because there's
an instruction in a comment doesn't mean people will remember to do what
it says when they add a new variable.
- Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 02:38:46PM +0530, India wrote:
> Hi,
> I have configure rsync 2.4.6-2 on redhat 7.1 but i am facing a
> problem while synchronizing big directory tree between two linux system
> over the network. Even if i mount any volume either through (nfs or ncp or
> samba) this syn
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 02:07:06AM -0800, Chris Cogdon wrote:
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I'm in desperate need of getting the '--force' option working. I've
> written a jitterbug entry on this already #3500
>
> Just curious to know if this is already being worked on, so I'm
> not duplicating anyone's e
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 04:05:01PM -0500, Mack, Daemian wrote:
> Is anyone successfully using the Cygwin rsync on Win2k (or NT4) as both
> daemon and client, with --delete-after working on the client?
>
> I can get --delete to work, but I'd prefer to delete files only on a
> successful transfer,
#!/bin/sh
for file in `rsh remote 'cd ~/Maildir;find . -type f -print'`
do
[ -f "~/Maildir/$file" ] && rm ~/Maildir/$file
done
Tim Conway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303.682.4917
Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC
1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D
Longmont, CO 80501
Available via SameTime Connect within Ph
rsync makes exact copies of filesystems. It's a mirroring tool, not a
backup tool. It stores the information as a filesystem, and if it's not
allowed to save group and user id on the filesystem, it doesn't. Perhaps
you need an archiving system? maybe doing incremental backups?
That said, if
19 matches
Mail list logo
