I would lean toward option "1" for several reasons. Primarily it could probably
inter-operate safely with non-HFS or older versions.
How about a flag that changes the mode to detect named forks and encode them in-line.
These encoded files could be safely synced to non-forked storage destination
I have two rsync 2.5.1pre3 sessions hung right now. In this case it
appears that the processes at the destination have exited and the src is
still waiting for something.
Here are some more details:
SRC: solaris 2.7 (2G RAM 2 CPU)
DST: linux (one is 2.4.8, the other is 2.2.18)
Transport: ssh
On Monday 17 December 2001 13:31, David Nickel Jr. wrote:
> I just finished installing rsync on one of my servers. But when I go to do
> a test connection via "rsync web1::" I get the following error
>
> rsync: failed to connect to web1: Connection refused
> rsync error: error in socket IO (code 1
On Monday 17 December 2001 11:17, David Nickel Jr. wrote:
> Howdy,
> I am pretty "green" with rsync so any help will be much appreciated.
> I want to mirror webserver A and webserver B. The two directories I want to
> mirror are /www/home and /www/default. I was wondering how I would set this
> u
>The other thing you absolutely need to send is the output of
>
>netstat -ta
Alas, this is Solaris... and not a system on which I have root.
I don't think this shows anything useful, but here goes.
Hosts are fido (client) and cvsroot (server). Output of netstat:
cvsroot$ netstat -a
Mailman has been upgraded; please ignore this message.
--
Martin
On 17 Dec 2001, Ed Santiago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rsync 2.5.0 still has a bug where it hangs under some circumstances.
>
> The hang is beyond my abilities to track down.
The other thing you absolutely need to send is the output of
netstat -ta
while the program is running. If netstat o
On 17 Dec 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently nobody else is having a problem with that. Can you please try
> the latest source under the "preview" directory to see if it still has the
> problem? If so, you'll probably need to debug it yourself and submit a
> patch becaus
On 6 Dec 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still hope to write a --files-from option sometime in 2001.
Excuse me if I've forgotten something from earlier: what happens when
the sender is remote? Do we send the contents of the file list across
along with the arguments, or does t
On 17 Dec 2001, "Kapoor, Nishikant X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excuse me for my ignorance but is this flag referring to the files with
> same filename on source and destination ? If the destination file has
> the same size as that of one on source but a different name, would it
> still skip i
On 4 Dec 2001, JD Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a new version of my rsync-server-over-remote-shell patch:
This looks good. My main reservation is that it makes it even harder
to explain how rsync works, but I think the increase in flexibility
justifies it.
I'd like to get some of
I just finished installing rsync on one of my servers. But when I go to do a
test connection via "rsync web1::" I get the following error
rsync: failed to connect to web1: Connection refused
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(84)
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 08:05:26AM -0800, Friedrisch Muller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to compile rsync 2.5.0 for RedHat linux 7.1
> alpha but I get compile errors. :-( Any ideas would be
> greatly appreciated!
>
> # uname -a
> Linux myhost 2.4.9-12 #1 Tue Oct 30 18:12:52 EST 2001
> alpha unknown
>
-I, --size-only
Normally rsync will skip any files that are already the
same length and have the same time-stamp. With the --
size-only option files will be skipped if they have the
same size, regardless of timestamp. This is useful when
I'm not familiar with netatalk, but along a similar line, Mac OS X
stores resource forks and metadata differently on HFS+ and single-fork
volumes (such as UFS or NFS). If you copy a file from an HFS+ volume
over to a single-fork volume using the Finder it'll split the pieces
apart and save the
I'm running 2.5.1pre3 and seeing lots hangs as well. Under
2.4.6+Waynes_nohang, I didn't have trouble this bad before.
SRC: solaris 2.7, netapps nfs tree
DST: solaris 2.8, linux 2.[2,4].*
TRANSPORT: ssh
This setup has worked well for months before the upgrade to 2.5.1.pre3.
I have not tried th
rsync 2.5.0 still has a bug where it hangs under some circumstances.
The hang is beyond my abilities to track down. I'll keep trying,
though, but here are details in case they're of use to anyone else:
- Code configured & built on Solaris 2.5.1.
- Same binary run on Solaris 2.5.1 (client) a
Howdy,
I am pretty "green" with rsync so any help will be much appreciated.
I want to mirror webserver A and webserver B. The two directories I want to
mirror are /www/home and /www/default. I was wondering how I would set this
up in rsycd.conf and how I would call it in a script? Thanks
David
instead of "*", which may not match anything, and thus name something that
doesn't exist, try using ".", which is the current directory. This isn't
dos, and * has no special meaning to rsync. it is, rather, globbed by
your shell, being replaced by whatever it matches, or returned as a
litera
Hello,
rsync returns zero if it is successful but a non-zero (2816) if it can
not find any file(s) to move across. Just curious if that should still
return zero ?
nkapoor> rsync -av * nk01::incoming
building file list ... * : No such file or directory
done
wrote 73 bytes read 337 bytes 820.00
> From: Mark Valence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 22:26:04 -0500
>
> 1) convert (on the fly) all files to MacBinary before
> comparing/sending them to the destination. MacBinary is a well
> documented way to package an HFS file into a single data file. The
> benefits with th
cd destdir
find . -type f -print >/tmp/excludelist
rsync -a --exclude-from=/tmp/excludelist srcserver:/srcdir/ .
Tim Conway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303.682.4917
Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC
1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D
Longmont, CO 80501
Available via SameTime Connect within Philips, n9hmg on
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:18:12AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> Subject: Re: CVS update: rsync
> On 14 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Modified Files:
> > options.c
> > Log Message:
> > When INET6 is not defined, meaning that IPv6 is not supported, need to
> > initalize the global_op
23 matches
Mail list logo
