On 10 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Running out of memory may be the problem. As a temporary workaround
> * perhaps you can create an additional swap file (rather than partition)
> * on the backup server?
OK. To help you out until then, you can do something like this
# dd if=/dev/ze
Martin Pool schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 08:20:47AM +1100:
* Do you see any error messages in the log file on the server?
Nope, none - the server thinks it has done all transfers (despite having
its childs still clinging to some 200MB mem...) successfully.
*
* Running out of memory may be th
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:00:05AM -0600, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:05:44AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
| > On 7 Dec 2001, Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > Please don't take this path - ownerships on symlinks are a pretty
| > > meaningless
Do you see any error messages in the log file on the server?
Running out of memory may be the problem. As a temporary workaround
perhaps you can create an additional swap file (rather than partition)
on the backup server?
The rsync hlink code seems to use a bit more memory than is really
necess
Hi,
I got stuck within some weird prob concerning my 2-node linux cluster and
the synchronisation tool at hand (rsync-2.5.1pre1).
I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these
directories are hardlinked to the data of the 1st directory. Within this
"orig data" directory
