On 7 Dec 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin, I don't think --enable-debug should define #DEBUG, I think it should
> only generate debugging symbols.
I think you're probably right.
--
Martin
> You can find a lot more information about the differences here:
>
> http://bitkeeper.com/4.1.1.html
>
> BitKeeper is not strictly Open Source, but arguably good enough.
I guess "arguably" is if you don't mind having all your metadata
logged to an open logging server?
> The proposed plan is
Hi All:
I am going thru the documentation and I noticed that there is some talk
about
returning error codes. Some Q:s
* If rsync encounters a network error, does it do retries ?
Can you control the # of retries ?
* Do the rsync client & server stop running upon encountering an error ?
Can
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:07:22AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> Yes, I agree. I'll just run GNU indent over it and commit directly --
> no need to send a big noisy patch unless you really want to.
Good plan, I wasn't sure how many issues like these GNU indent is able to fix.
I'll have a look agai
Currently the --write-batch option in addition to creating the batch files
also syncs the target tree. I'm not sure whether this is always desired. So
far the only way I have been able to come up with to prevent the target tree
from being populated is the patch below; however, the top-level targe
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 10:53:17AM -0600, Holstein, Brian wrote:
> Are there any known patches to use a users effective uid rather than the
> environment variables USER or LOGNAME with an rsync server. Any suggestions
> would be appreciated.
The server doesn't use those variables, but the clien
Are there any known
patches to use a users effective uid rather than the
environment
variables USER or LOGNAME with an rsync server. Any suggestions
would be
appreciated.
_Brian
Brian
Holstein
Sysadmin
SLK Hull
derivatives
The only circumstance where i could see symlink ownership being an issue
would be in the case where one might need to be changed, on those systems
which support that. Most i've seen delete and recreate the link, so if
the person needing to own the link has write, with no sticky bit, on the
co
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 12:02:35PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I recently upgraded one of my servers to 2.5.0. Since then, I've been
> getting error messages like following between 2.5.0 and 2.4.6 servers.
>
> bit length overflow
> code 3 bits 7->6
> code 10 bits 5->6
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:05:44AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2001, Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please don't take this path - ownerships on symlinks are a pretty
> > meaningless concept
...
> > Why _not_ take the conservation approach "unless somebody reports a
> >
On 6 Dec 2001, Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a list of cosmetic changes I'd be willing to make to the code in order
> to make it more consistent, which stylisticly it currently is not.
>
> - separate function definitions by 2 newlines
> - put spaces after commas in arg lists
> -
On 7 Dec 2001, Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please don't take this path - ownerships on symlinks are a pretty
> meaningless concept
Right. For just this reason I just changed the regression test to use
an included "tiny ls", rather than the system's ls, because on some
systems
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 10:56:17AM +0100, Niels Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | Does anybody run rsync on Apollo?
| > Hell, they run it on Windoze :-( I know what I'd rather use.
| Huh? In stead of Windows, or in stead of rsync? :)
|
| There's a lot of Windows-users out there, and I thi
Incidentally, here's an interesting BitKeeper demostration/tutorial:
http://www.bitkeeper.com/demo/
--
Martin
> | Does anybody run rsync on Apollo?
> Hell, they run it on Windoze :-( I know what I'd rather use.
Huh? In stead of Windows, or in stead of rsync? :)
There's a lot of Windows-users out there, and I think rsync is a great tool
on Windows-systems too. :)
No OS-wars here, just wanted to know if
15 matches
Mail list logo
