command= and arbitrary keys...

2001-11-30 Thread Dave Wreski
Hi all, I've asked this question before, but I was never able to fix the problem, and now it's back again and I'd like to try and resolve it. I have an authorized_keys file with about twenty keys, most of which are prefaced with command="/usr/bin/rsync ...". If I put my host key at the top of th

Re: Why does one of there work and the other doesn't

2001-11-30 Thread tim . conway
100bytes/file of file information for every file, whether it is to be transferred or not. YMMV Tim Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 303.682.4917 Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC 1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D Longmont, CO 80501 Available via SameTime Connect within Philips, n9hmg on AIM perl -e 'pr

Re: include/exclude ?

2001-11-30 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:18:16PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You're right. the order dependency actually lets you create very complex > include/exclude rules. for each item, each --include and --exclude is > evaluated in commandline order, until the item has either passed all the > te

RE: Why does one of there work and the other doesn't

2001-11-30 Thread David Bolen
From: Randy Kramer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > I am not sure which end the 100 bytes per file applies to, and I guess > that is the RAM memory footprint?. Does rsync need 100 bytes for each > file that might be transferred during a session (all files in the > specified directory(ies)), or does

RE: include/exclude ?

2001-11-30 Thread tim . conway
You're right. the order dependency actually lets you create very complex include/exclude rules. for each item, each --include and --exclude is evaluated in commandline order, until the item has either passed all the tests, and is thus included, or has been excluded, at which point evaluation

RE: include/exclude ?

2001-11-30 Thread Kapoor, Nishikant X
It is finally working but I am not sure if I understand it right. It seems to me that the order in which 'include' and 'exclude' exist in the command line is making all the difference. Check out the following two commands: *** include is BEFORE exclude - Working fine ! *** [admx:test] $ rsync -va

rsync-2.5.0 patch for "make check" bug

2001-11-30 Thread Tom Schmidt
Attached is a patch for rsync 2.5.0 to fix the "make check" option. The find command was not being passwd the current directory in the hands.test and longdir.test testsuites, which caused them to fail on SunOS 4.X and Solaris 2.X systems. Tom -- Tom L. Schmidt, Manager/SysAdmin Characterization

Re: cannot create .hosts.b0WX1x : File exists

2001-11-30 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:08:19AM +0100, Rok Krulec wrote: > Hello Dave, > > > What version of sources is that which had mkstemp at line 121 of > > syscall.c? It's surprising that you could just replace one with the other, > > as mkstemp is supposed to open the file and mktemp is not supposed t

Re: open issue regarding local copies and -W

2001-11-30 Thread Dave Dykstra
On 4 Sep 2001 21:24:33 +1000, Martin Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14 Aug 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin, > > > I want to remind you that there's still an open issue regarding copies when > > both source and destination are on the local machine (including over NFS

Any chance of --no-detatch in the next release

2001-11-30 Thread Max Bowsher
This option is required for use on cygwin in server mode - so integrating it into the main code would be very helpful for us cygwinners. It is after all a rather small patch - doesn't clutter up the code that much :-) Max.

Re: Why does one of there work and the other doesn't

2001-11-30 Thread Randy Kramer
Martin Pool wrote: > Ian Kettleborough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. How much memory does each file to be copied need. Obvisiouly I have too many > > files. > > Hard to say exactly. On the order of a hundred bytes per file. I may have misunderstood the question, but maybe we should point ou

rsync 2.5.0 bit length overflow

2001-11-30 Thread Thomas J Pinkl
I'm seeing: bit length overflow code 4 bits 6->7 in the output of rsync 2.5.0 between two Red Hat Linux systems. One is RH 6.1 (kernel 2.2.19-6.2.1, glibc 2.1.3-22), the other is RH 7.2 (kernel 2.4.9-13, glibc 2.2.4-19). Both systems have rsync 2.5.0. On the RH 6.1 box, I run this comman

Re: include/exclude ?

2001-11-30 Thread tim . conway
rsync doesn't do the odd wildcard syntax you show there... you'll have to do --include=an* --include=mp* --include=ERR* Tim Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 303.682.4917 Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC 1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D Longmont, CO 80501 Available via SameTime Connect within Philips,

include/exclude ?

2001-11-30 Thread Kapoor, Nishikant X
All, Could someone please help me resolve this: [admx:test] $ ls ERR01 ah01 ah02 an01 an02 mp01 mp02 [admx:test] $ ls {an,mp,ERR}* ERR01 an01 an02 mp01 mp02 I want to rsync only the "{an,mp,ERR}*" files across using the following command but do not see the expected results.

Re: Why does one of there work and the other doesn't

2001-11-30 Thread tim . conway
from "man rsync": a trailing slash on the source changes this behavior to transfer all files from the directory src/bar on the machine foo into the /data/tmp/. A trailing / on a source name means "copy the contents of this directory". Without a trailing sl