RE: Problem with transfering large files.

2001-09-20 Thread David Bolen
I'm not Dave Dykstra [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes: > On September 9 Tridge submitted a fix to CVS for that problem. See > revision 1.25 at > http://pserver.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/generator.c I'm not sure that fixes the use of the timeout for the overall process. See a recent answer b

Re: Problem with transfering large files.

2001-09-20 Thread tim . conway
i meant to send this to the whole list... maybe someone else has seen it and can figure out how to fix it. Tim Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 303.682.4917 Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC 1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D Longmont, CO 80501 Available via SameTime Connect within Philips Available as n

Re: rsync and SSL

2001-09-20 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:11:18AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:00:46AM +, M. Drew Streib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:47:15AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > | > That way we could do SMTP over SSL etc etc transparently: clients connec

Re: Problem with transfering large files.

2001-09-20 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 08:52:26AM -0500, Carey Jung wrote: > > > > Not so. > > > > --timeout=TIMEOUT > > This option allows you to set a maximum IO timeout in > > seconds. If no data is transferred for the specified > > time then rsync will exit. The defa

Re: rsync and SSL

2001-09-20 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:00:46AM +, M. Drew Streib wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:47:15AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > That way we could do SMTP over SSL etc etc transparently: clients connect, > > say "SSL", if rejected either fall back or fall out, and if accepted > > then away w

RE: permissions bug w/ --backup-dir or --backup option?

2001-09-20 Thread Carey Jung
> > This works great for us, because 1) it's faster, and 2) we really don't > care about the directory permissions/owners unless the directory is > changed directly by a move/rename/delete. That said, you do have a > point. (And, just because I don't use it, doesn't mean it's not right > :^) He

Re: permissions bug w/ --backup-dir or --backup option?

2001-09-20 Thread James Delahanty
Carey, What you are seeing is, in fact, the case, but the function that creates the dirs is robust_move() in backup.c The backup option captures files and/or directories that are deleted or changed between syncs. So, if a directory is *changed* (deleted/renamed/moved), then the directory *and*

RE: Problem with transfering large files.

2001-09-20 Thread Carey Jung
> > Not so. > > --timeout=TIMEOUT > This option allows you to set a maximum IO timeout in > seconds. If no data is transferred for the specified > time then rsync will exit. The default is 0, which > means no timeout. > > The 2400 second timeo

Re: Problem with transfering large files.

2001-09-20 Thread Scott Howard
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:15:12PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Easy enough... look at your parameters. You're saying that you must not transfer >more than 48kb in a session... you actual mileage will be slightly smaller, >because of overhead. You have limited yourself to a bandwidth

RE: rsync via ssh

2001-09-20 Thread Harala, Sauli
Hi, We were just today making some promising tests with F-Secure sshd2 v 3.0 and rsync 2.4.6 in OSF1 (Digital Unix). The rsync+'ssh2 v2.0' server on OSF1 were hanging - but first small tests did not any more show this trouble. This hanging was most often totally preventing using ssh+rsyn