Re: any news about rsync and acl's?

2001-07-13 Thread tim . conway
Maybe rsync isn't ready to do it yet, but you could cheat. Have the server side prepare a list of ACLs, from which they can be reconstructed on the reciever. I'm sure there's a more efficient way to do it, maybe with the Solaris-ACL perl package, or coding it in C, but here's a quick and dirty

Re: any news about rsync and acl's?

2001-07-13 Thread Phil Howard
Martin Pool wrote: > On 12 Jul 2001, "Obergehrer, Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anybody know if rsync can be used in a way to preserve the ACL's? > > If not, are there plans to implement it in the near future? > > If not, are there other tools which can handle ACL's when > > synch

Re: rsync+ patch

2001-07-13 Thread Alberto Accomazzi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Pool writes: > I'm inclined to apply this: at the very least, it doesn't look like it > could damage anything else. Any other opinions? Yes please! I would personally love to see that functionality supported in the stock rsync distributions. Since the pa

new to rsync for WIN: failed to connect - descriptor is a file not a socket

2001-07-13 Thread Florian Jantscher
I've tried to use rsync to build the debian CD Images from their pseudo-image kit. Yet, everytime I run it, I get the error message: failed to connect to ftp.fi.debian.org - descriptor is a file not a socket. I am running Windows 98 (which I want to get rid of, and run linux instead) and I do have

Re: Two issues (rsync 2.4.6)

2001-07-13 Thread Phil Howard
Paul D. Smith wrote: > I have an anon rsync (2.4.6) daemon set up in my inetd on a Solaris 2.6 > server. > > I'm seeing two strange things, and I wonder if anyone has any comments. > I tried using Google and other searches for these but didn't come up > with anything very useful (a list of error