Hi!
Ive been trying to make rsync run for the past week
or so on my two machines running on Solaris and NT but
to no avail.
Heres my setup.
I was able to setup rsync on my Winnt machine as a
service based on Mike McHenry Documentation on the
Rsync Web page. I have the following .conf fil
-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Mark - MST
Sent: Tuesday, 15 May 2001 15:31
To: 'Dave Dykstra'
Subject: RE: Problem with large include files
> No, rsync can't run over UDP. Perhaps there are some TCP parameters you
> can tweak. I wouldn't be surprised if the combination of the hig
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:54:08AM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
>
> > Try rsync 2.3.2 on both ends and see what the result is.
>
> > What transport method are you using (rsh, ssh, or rsync --daemon mode)?
>
> --daemon mode. Some tests a colleague did showed a performance advantage.
>
>
> Try rsync 2.3.2 on both ends and see what the result is.
> What transport method are you using (rsh, ssh, or rsync --daemon mode)?
--daemon mode. Some tests a colleague did showed a performance advantage.
> Come to think of it, I know from experience that rsync is able to keep the
> TCP q
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:32:01PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > The optimization bypassed the normal recursive traversal of all the
> > files and directly opened the included files and sent the list over.
>
> There's an alternative to this optimizatio
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> The optimization bypassed the normal recursive traversal of all the
> files and directly opened the included files and sent the list over.
There's an alternative to this optimization: if we could read the
source files from a file (or stdin), we could us
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:13:40AM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote:
...
> > As a thought, have you or any of the other developers thought of getting
> > rsync to operate over a number of streams or to use "sliding windows" to
> > overcome latency effects?
>
> I don't recall that that subject has been d
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:12:27PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
> Dave
>
> A couple of points:
>
> 1. I think you are telling me that if I go back to 2.3.2 my problems should
> go away. Is this correct?
Hopefully, assuming you trigger the optimization (no wildcards in the
includes followed
Mark,
I reverted back to rsync 2.3.2 after a massive complain from our user trying to get
their data from their machine to the target sites. Since rsync been running very
smoothly.
Just as a background. I have been using rsync for about 3 years now and been using
2.3.2 since it came out. I
