On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 03:39:39PM +1100, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
> > [60GB]
> > path = /home/ftp/pub
> > comment = Basic mirror. Maximum of 60GB in size.
> > include from = /etc/rsync.d/60gb.conf
> >
> > [90GB]
> > path = /home/ftp/pub
> > comment = Basic m
> [60GB]
> path = /home/ftp/pub
> comment = Basic mirror. Maximum of 60GB in size.
> include from = /etc/rsync.d/60gb.conf
>
> [90GB]
> path = /home/ftp/pub
> comment = Basic mirror. Maximum of 90GB in size.
> include from = /etc/rsync.d/90gb.conf
>
On 18 Mar 2001, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed rsync for Solaris (from source, using default configure
> options). When I ran rsync for a directory that already existed on both
> machines, it appeared to update permissions, etc. successfully. I'm unable
>
Major features in this release:
* Much better compression than previous versions.
* Much better performance, too. :)
* Portability fixes for Solaris and FreeBSD from Alberto Accomazzi
and Jos Backus. librsync at the moment does not work on platforms
that can't do unaligned memory acce
On 18 Mar 2001, Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * I don't think we need multiple streams inside a single connection,
> >although perhaps this is a failure of imagination on my part.
>
> Or my confusion. I thought there were like three open TCP streams with
> bidirectional communic
I'm not a BEEP expert. If you'd like, perhaps we can bring Kris
Magnusson into the loop.
> use it we should certainly learn from it.
Agreed.
> * There seems to be no C implementation yet. Much as I like Java and
>Python, I think rsync still needs to be done in C, and building
>this w
Hi,
I just installed rsync for Solaris (from source, using default configure
options). When I ran rsync for a directory that already existed on both
machines, it appeared to update permissions, etc. successfully. I'm unable
to get it to add files that exist in the source but not the destinati
(Anton cc'd because he seems to like this kind of stuff.)
I was looking at the MD4 routines in librsync, which are basically the
same as those in rsync. I noticed how much time they spend in copying
from one buffer to another, I think mostly because the code is old and
crufty, but partly because
