Might have sommething to do with the netapps .snapshot dirs.
--Mike
At 02:04 PM 1/18/01 -0800, Jeff Kennedy wrote:
>Greetings all,
>
>I have a source directory that is not being touched by anyone, no
>updates or even reads except by the rsync host. I am using just a
>straight binary, no
Jeff Kennedy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> I have a source directory that is not being touched by anyone, no
> updates or even reads except by the rsync host. I am using just a
> straight binary, no rsyncd.conf file. I am using the follwing command:
>
> rsync -avz /source/path/dir /dest/path/d
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:04:46PM -0800, Jeff Kennedy wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I have a source directory that is not being touched by anyone, no
> updates or even reads except by the rsync host. I am using just a
> straight binary, no rsyncd.conf file. I am using the follwing command:
>
>
Greetings all,
I have a source directory that is not being touched by anyone, no
updates or even reads except by the rsync host. I am using just a
straight binary, no rsyncd.conf file. I am using the follwing command:
rsync -avz /source/path/dir /dest/path/dir
Using version 2.4.6 on Solaris 7
You can add the "-L" option. Unfortunately, that will follow all symlinks
on the source too, not just that one.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 03:39:29PM -0500, Scott Gribben wrote:
> We have been running rsync for a while and it works great! But, we just ran
> into a situation I need
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:26:14PM -0500, David Bolen wrote:
> But the rub I always get into is the question of how do I know that a
> cached set of checksum information is actually for a given file. That
> is, if I store checksums for file x.y in x.y.checksum, how do I
> positively know that the
Goswin Brederlow [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> Why not just a syntax to fetch the checksums of a file with a
> certain blocksize (which the server may honor, but might also use a
> different one). Then the checksums could be generated on the fly or
> cached by the server. no need to have a file a
Marquis Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
>I found yesterday that this was my fault. I
> probably should not have used rsync -avvv. When I used rsync -av it
> worked fine. Thanks for your help.
Yes, using more than two "-v" options can cause a problem, although I
nor
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:02:13AM -0500, Hal Haygood wrote:
> Due to my ongoing issues with 2.4.6, I'm planning on backrevving our
> enterprise to 2.3.1. (We were using 2.2.1 before I started mucking about.)
I am using 2.4.6 throughout my enterprise and have not encountered any
problems that w
Thanks for your help. I found yesterday that this was my fault. I probably
should not have used rsync -avvv. When I used rsync -av it worked fine.
Thanks for your help.
-Original Message-
From: Jason truong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 5:24 PM
To: Marqui
> " " == Tim Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Folks here may be interested in the Internet Draft "Delta
> encoding in HTTP". Briefly, the idea is for a client or
> downstream proxy to tell a server or upstream proxy that it
> already has a particular version (specified
> " " == Tim Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there. A colleague and I here at OSA have been looking at
> exactly this for some time now. We have implemented two
> prototypes over HTTP and have found that the number of blocks
> matched is almost identical whichever w
12 matches
Mail list logo
