Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-20 Thread rubyphunk
Hi, same problem here. I always used "example.implementation_backtrace" in a custom formatter to find out to which spec file a passing example belongs to. Is there another way to get the file path? lg // andreas On 20 Nov., 20:37, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2008, at 2

[rspec-users] Backtrace for passing specs

2008-11-21 Thread rubyphunk
Hi, I'm using example.implementation_backtrace in a custom formatter to get the path of the file a passing spec belongs to. Following rspec on github I saw that implementation_backtrace is now deprecated and replaced by example.backtrace. Sadly it always returns nil for passed specs. So I had a lo

[rspec-users] [ANN] RSpactor 1.0.1

2009-01-02 Thread rubyphunk
Hi all, I'm happy to announce the first public RSpactor release 1.0.1. RSpactor is an autotest/autospec like Mac OS X 10.5 gui application that takes care of your rspec examples. It watches for changes and runs these files. You can download 1.0.1 here: http://rspactorapp.com/assets/downloads/rs

[rspec-users] [ANN] RSpec mailing list Google Group mirror

2008-02-21 Thread rubyphunk
Hi. I've created a Google Group 'rspec' that acts as a mirror to the RSpec- users mailing list. You can find the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rspec. lg -- andreas ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mai

[rspec-users] [ANN] RSpactor 0.0.2 : autorun your spec files

2008-03-11 Thread rubyphunk
Hi all. I want to introduce RSpactor and its "draft" release 0.2.0. RSpactor is a little command line tool to automatically run your changed specs (much like autotest). As you may expect, it concentrates on the use of RSpec. It was especially designed to use filesystem events like FSEvent on Leopa

[rspec-users] ANN: RSpactor 0.9.10 (aka. beta)

2008-04-28 Thread rubyphunk
Hey all. I've just release a first preview/beta of the upcoming RSpactor.app; a spec runner for Mac OS X Leopard. This is just some kind of test version and I'm looking for people who love to sit on the edge :) I need some help to find bugs and polish the interface/interaction. RSpactor is basica

Re: [rspec-users] ANN: RSpactor 0.9.10 (aka. beta)

2008-04-29 Thread rubyphunk
gt; -Corey > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > I'm using rspactor now over autotest. I'll give the beta a shot. > > > -Corey > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:51 PM, rubyphunk <[EMAIL P

Re: [rspec-users] ANN: RSpactor 0.9.10 (aka. beta)

2008-04-30 Thread rubyphunk
Hi. On 30 Apr., 14:49, Glenn Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Works for me!  However I have a feature request.  Currently I exclude   > certain files like so: > Autotest.add_hook :initialize do |at| >    %w{this_kind that_kind .git vendor .blah}.each {|exception|   > at.add_exception(exception)}

Re: [rspec-users] ANN: RSpactor 0.9.10 (aka. beta)

2008-04-30 Thread rubyphunk
On 30 Apr., 15:54, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is great.  I have been using it since Monday and I am loving it.   > Is there a mailing list setup just for RSpactor? Since shortly :) http://groups.google.com/group/rspactor - andreas ___ r

Re: [rspec-users] Do you remember RSpactor?

2008-08-14 Thread rubyphunk
On 8 Aug., 19:11, "Mark Wilden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been using RSpactor (the gem version, not the GUI) fairly happily for a > month or so. However, when trying the GUI version out, it became clear that > RSpactor loads things differently than 'rake spec'. Today, using the gem > versio

Re: [rspec-users] RSpactor: Black is the new green?

2008-08-14 Thread rubyphunk
On 8 Aug., 17:55, Jay Levitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Failing specs do show up as red, but passing ones show up as black in the > lefthand drawer (though the "bar" is green in the main display pane) - known > bug? No its not a bug. The lefthand drawer shows all your spec files. The right, main