On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:51:08 -0500, you wrote:
>It's just a small battle in the never-ending war against the increase
>of entropy.
>
>It may seem hard, but remember the more you fight it the more you
>delay the heat death of the universe!
Actually, it's just the opposite: Any attempt to reduce lo
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:34:34 -0500, you wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2008-09-29, at 07:58, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>>
...
>>>
>>> I'm not sure why that is offhand, still waking up this fine Monday
>>> morning, but I'd recommend throwing th
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:40:08 -0700, you wrote:
>I wrote a blog post that may be helpful.
>http://www.patmaddox.com/blog/demeter-is-for-encapsulation Basically,
>when you have structural objects as in this case, demeter isn't
>useful.
That's a good example as far as it goes, but I think it makes
Just so you know, _your_ message isn't just plain text. Here's a portion
of the raw message:
>--===0527642389==
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b0eedf7860046942ecfc
>
>--001636c5b0eedf7860046942ecfc
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:56:00 -0700, you wrote:
>This will work (I'll go update the code now) but it still leaves the
>problem I mentioned that if you are unfamiliar with the vagaries of
>floating point math -- or even if you momentarily forget -- then using
>== will occasionally mysteriously fail.
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:50:27 -0400, you wrote:
>I've had a matcher in my head for a couple months, that I frequently
>want but never get around to writing because I can't think of the name
>for it. Here's how it would look
>
>[1, 2, 3, 4, 1].should ... [1, 3, 1, 4, 2]
An unordered collection with
