Re: [rspec-users] bad specs better than none?

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Glenn Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree with David - you are certainly on the right track. I also think you are doing the right thing when you write specs even if they seem not perfect to you at first attempt - once you have written the code you can evaluate

[rspec-users] Spec::Rails::Example::ModelExampleGroup

Hi list! I get some not-so-nice output from rspec-rails when using the -f specdoc option. It happens both with the spec command and the rake task and on a prestine, newly generated rails app. I'm using rspec & rspec-rails 1.1.4 and rails 2.0.1. Is this a bug? Do you get the same output? -- Siem

Re: [rspec-users] Spec::Rails::Example::ModelExampleGroup

Thanks for you reply! I had tried the newest checkouts of rsepc and rspec-rails from git as well, but my locally installed rspec gem was 1.1.4 and apparently rake did use that instead! -- Siemen ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org htt