[rspec-users] feature suggestion: straight strings

Sorry if I mentioned this one before, but has anyone proposed being able to do something like "it should be able".to { } ? (or something like that)... Might be preferable where a test description doesn't start with "it" Thoughts? Thanks. -r -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _

Re: [rspec-users] Cucumber: Running a single feature / scenario

cucumber path/to/file.feature --line 33 seems to still work (google led me here, too). -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] run rspec by hand (without spec command)

maybe it runs at at_exit? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

[rspec-users] !~ seems to not work

>> 'abc' ~! /def/ => true 'abc'.should !~ /def/ fails though. Seemed unexpected... -roger- -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

[rspec-users] pretty inspect for diff?

Hello. I noticed this test "failed" message: https://gist.github.com/1165975 The salient part is this diff: Diff: @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -{"blank_outs"=>[["0:00:56.0", "0:00:57.0"], ["0:01:05", "0:01:14.500"]], +{"imdb_id"=>"tt1727587", "mutes"=>[], - "imdb

Re: [rspec-users] ruby 1.8.6

> It's growing increasingly difficult for RSpec to support Ruby 1.8.6 as > other libraries that rspec's development environment relies on drop > support. Noting that 1.8.7 was released over three years ago (6/1/2008), > I'd like to drop support for Ruby 1.8.6 for future versions of RSpec, > but I'd

[rspec-users] slightly confusing error message

This error message: it 'should' do proc { eval("a=")}.should raise_exception(/SyntaxError/) end expected Exception with message matching /SyntaxError/, got # Is a bit confusing, since it appears from the error output that it *does* match /SyntaxError/ Might be able to word

[rspec-users] warn on stubbing nonexistent method?

Hello. Perhaps rspec-mocks could warn if it stubs a not yet existing method? class A end describe RSpec do it 'should' do a = A.new a.stub!(:nonexistent_method) {} end end This might help the development process by pointing out possible discrepancies between rspec tests and the code (fo

Re: [rspec-users] rspec-mocks and rspec-rails-2.10.1 are released!

Thanks David. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] An open source project with very good use of Cucumber?

redcar uses it, or at least used to, with good results. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users