Hi,
I have started writing my own generators, and I was wondering if anyone
had any suggestions for testing them.
I know I could just run the generator in a dummy application; write my
tests; and then copy the tests back into the generator. But that seems
backwards.
Any ideas?
Thanks
--
Posted
Scott Taylor wrote:
> Why don't you generate the specs when you generate the code?
That's what I thought I'd have to do. The reason I'm reluctant to do it
is that either I need to write the real code first (and not tests
first). Or I need to rerun my generator every time I write a new test
(or
When I run `rake features` after adding cucumber v0.1.8 to my rails app
(as a plugin), I get success. But when I upgrade to edge, I get this
error:
"
|/home/paul/sc/ror/cebu_heroku/vendor/plugins/cucumber/bin/../lib/cucumber/formatters/pretty_formatter.rb:205:in
`ljust': no implicit conversion f
Barry Mitchelson wrote:
> This sounds like the issue I had here
> http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/60-patch-next_column_index-not-resetting-after-large-tables.
> Is there a feature running before this one with a scenario table with
> at
> least 2 more columns than the one in th
Alex Satrapa wrote:
> I can't understand why people who are serious about production
> environment stability would install multiple applications in the same
> environment. It's not healthy.
One very nice way to do this is to run each app with its own user, then
have a ~/.gems directory. Then you
Matt Wynne wrote:
> What do people think? Is this stuff so trivially easy to other people
> that they prefer just to write it from scratch?
I think that sharing these will be a really good way to help people
learning Cucumber write better features and steps.
Writing cucumber features that pass i
James Byrne wrote:
> This is what I see in the console:
The underlining didn't come through in you post, so that doesn't help
us.
If you post your step matchers, then we can tell you what your columns
need to be. Essentially, for every (.*) in your step matchers, you need
a column. And they hav
I was writing a feature in which I had webrat push a button. However,
there are many buttons on this page with the same text. I wanted to
specify which one would be push in as close a way I could to the way a
person would describe which one he was pushing. Here is what I ended up
with:
#custom_web
aslak hellesoy wrote:
> give buttons unique dom ids and pass the id to #clicks_button ?
Of course that's the easy way to do it :)
I was hoping to keep my stories a bit closer to English. Plus then I'd
need some extra instance variable so that step can calculate the dom_id.
Here is an example o
Andrew Premdas wrote:
> And I accept Fred's invite
> scans better than
> And I push "accept" near "Fred"
That definitely is better. I guess I was trying to be too broad. My
original goal was to write a match that would work on any page with
multiple links/buttons (of the same name).
It see
Shane Mingins wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just giving cucumber a trial with a Rails application and was wanting
> some feedback on what I did for my project token that is a system
> generated value
>
>Scenario: Register new project
> Given I am logged in
> And I am on the new project page
Pat Maddox wrote:
> Here's my latest Theory of Testing, in a nutshell:
I really understand what you are getting at. However, as I less
experienced developer (my degree is actually in business) I have found
that having more unit tests (for models and controllers) helps ensure
that I write better
Shane Mingins wrote:
> I'm not an expert at regexpr the output on screen is:
I'm no regex expert, but it is such a useful skill I'm always trying to
improve.
This might do it for you:
/\\s*\Token\:\<\/b\>\s*[a-f0-9]{40}\s*\<\/p\>/m
Cheers,
Paul
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_
Pau Cor wrote:
> /\\s*\Token\:\<\/b\>\s*[a-f0-9]{40}\s*\<\/p\>/m
On second thought, you might want to make that regex more generic. When
you refactor your view code (i.e. insert divs, add ids/classes, and get
rid of the tags--which are evil) then your test won't break.
The
Hi. I'm trying to write a matcher to make sure a radio button is
selected when the page loads.
I got this at the moment:
When /^I leave "(.*)" selected$/ do |label|
field = field_labeled label
unless field.instance_variable_get("@element")['checked'] &&
field.instance_variable_get("@element")
Zach Dennis wrote:
> response.should
> have_tag("input[type=radio][checked=checked][name=?][valued=?]",
> "your[button]", "foo")
Wouldn't that require me to do this: My label
My validator is saying that is not valid XHTML.
Thanks for the suggestion. I definitely haven't looked into the power of
Newman Huang wrote:
> I think it is a common test case you would meet. For example, you want
> to test a user registry scenario. You write:
>
> Scenario: User Registry
>When I dosth
>Then I dosth
>...
>
> And now business has some changes. Register should have to activate his
> accoun
Matt Wynne wrote:
> I think I might be right in saying that technique is likely to be
> deprecated in the future. I don't think it's recommended anymore. See
> my earlier response.
Thanks Matt. That is good to know.
Paul
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_
Hi,
I just posted a tiny app that I put together for a presentation on
Cucumber.
http://github.com/thoughtless/cuc_demo/tree/master
This essentially mirrors the workflow that I strive towards. (The README
explains more.) I don't want to put myself out there as the standard to
immitate, but I thin
Fernando García Samblas wrote:
> IMHO it would be nice to have instead a "context_definitions.rb" with
> common "givens" (similar to navigation_definitions.rb) and there a more
> general definition, like for instance:
...
> Given /^there are no (.*)$/ do |thing|
I really like that. It will make
What is the syntax for calling multiline steps from other steps? I'd
like to do something like this:
Given /^I have filled in the form$/ do |details|
details.hashes.each |pair|
When "I fill in #{pair['field']} with #{pair['value']}"
end
end
Given /^(.*) has filled in the form$/ do |user,
Ben Mabey wrote:
> you will just have to
> experiment and see.
Thanks for the reply!
So far all my experiments have failed :/
Anyone else have any ideas?
Paul
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge
Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
> And please link to this thread in the ticket. Nabble or somesuch.
I am sorry for taking so long to post the ticket:
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber/tickets/144-call-multiline-steps-from-other-steps
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_
Sarah Allen wrote:
> What if I wanted to destroy the lorry with "name 3" instead of the 3rd
> lorry?
I was trying to solve a similar problem a few weeks ago. You might be
interested in the response I got: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/171269
HTH
Paul
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Can you please post the contents of your step definition?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Fernando Perez wrote:
> However yesterday I looked in the code of a project (mephistoblog was
> it?), and I noticed that they have: config.gem 'nokogiri' in
> environement.rb. I don't have it, is it compulsory for correctly parsing
> the response body?
I don't have config.gem 'nokogiri' in envi
> I have had some trouble
> with ajax-heavy stuff but never took the time to sort it out.
I had some trouble too at first. Some things that seem like they
_should_ work just don't. But I seem to have gotten past it. If anyone
has a specific problem post here, and I'll give it a try :)
Or you c
27 matches
Mail list logo
