(Sorry if this is double-posted, I was having trouble with joining the
list)
If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
acts_as_fu: http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
ActiveRecord models dead simple.
Pat
On Jan 29, 10:18 pm, Ben Mabey wrote:
> Jam
Speaking as the author of a "-fu" project, I'll say that I named
acts_as_fu that way because it aids the creation of ActiveRecord
extensions, which very commonly have names starting with "acts_as" or
ending with "fu". This sort of meta-extension of that workflow means
that you can look at it in two
rne wrote:
> Pat Nakajima wrote:
> > If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
> > acts_as_fu:http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
> > ActiveRecord models dead simple.
>
> This seems to work very well. However, I am causing mys
After taking another look, I think you may be able to do something
like this to test your logger: https://gist.github.com/3c55cbec990f283c5399
Let me know if that works.
Pat
On Jan 30, 11:10 am, James Byrne wrote:
> Pat Nakajima wrote:
> > If you want an easy way to test Act
James,
Can you show me how you're trying to use ActsAsFu?
Pat
On Jan 30, 11:52 am, James Byrne wrote:
> Pat Nakajima wrote:
> > If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
> > acts_as_fu:http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
>
stamps }
@person = Person.create!
end
it "adds created_at" do
@person.created_at.should_not be_nil
end
it "adds updated_at" do
@person.updated_at.should_not be_nil
end
end
Pat
On Jan 30, 3:24 pm, James Byrne wrote:
> Ja
I started writing up a response about why I wrote Fixjour, and why I
want it to be its own project, but it got really long. Here's a
Markdownified gist: http://gist.github.com/60389.
For the record, I think FR is a great tool (I link to it in Fixjour's
README), it's just not for me. Read the gist
y, but because I'm not sure if it should be more explicit.
Pat
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
> Pat Nakajima wrote:
>>
>> I started writing up a response about why I wrote Fixjour, and why I
>> want it to be its own project, but it got really long
>
> (3) with_tag is completely broken, as it tries to use the outer class as
> the subject of 'with_tag', rather than the have_tag matcher that it lives
> inside.
>
If you're testing markup (view tests or whatever), take a look at my
elementor project[1]. I've found that it makes view testing a lo
Here's the step I use for taking screenshots:
https://gist.github.com/dff2a429afff1c212416.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Arco wrote:
> I am using Cucumber with Webrat/Watir/Celerity for UI testing.
>
> I would like to generate an error report which shows the page image
> for each failed test
(I extracted the method in the Gist, so it may be a bit off)
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Pat Nakajima wrote:
> Here's the step I use for taking screenshots:
> https://gist.github.com/dff2a429afff1c212416.
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Arco wrote:
>> I am usi
For what it's worth, here's how I had to hack Webrat to get my Sinatra 0.9.1
app working properly: http://gist.github.com/73735.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> Have created sample sinatra cucumber app as suggested on wiki. Tried both
> env.rb configurations from there a
Rob,
Is your Sinatra app using the "classic" style? If so, I think it would
work without need for modification. If your app is a class that
inherits from Sinatra::Base, you're likely to see issues unless you
take the steps in the Gist.
Pat
On Mar 4, 2009, at 4:43 AM, Rob Holland wrote:
I've posted it on this list before, but if you're writing view tests, check
out Elementor:
http://pivotallabs.com/users/patn/blog/articles/608-better-view-testing-with-elementor.
It provides a much cleaner way of asserting on markup, and doesn't require
you to litter your expectations with CSS sele
>
> Has anyone tried this? is it useful?
>
It looks interesting, though it could be confused for trying to exactly
mimic the actual markup, not just specify interesting parts.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Phlip wrote:
> http://gist.github.com/76136
>>
>
> response.body.should be_html_wit
15 matches
Mail list logo
