Hi,
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 01:58, Ants Pants wrote:
> I thought that the controller.stub(:require_member).and_return(member) would
> suffice for the require_member stuff but I'm obviously wrong. I've even
> replaced the member for @member in my spec but to no avail.
> Here's the describe example
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:32, Lille wrote:
> I frequently use the -l option to run only tests of interest, but it's
> messy in a way I don't understand...
>
> describe SomeModel do
>
> describe "#some_method" do
>
> it... # let's call this line 20
>
> end
>
> describe "#some_other_met
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 15:45, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> When running the script i am getting output as
> User Profile should not be created if name is blank
> Failure/Error: @contact_detail.should be_valid
> expected valid? to return true, got false
> # ./spec/models/merchant_spec
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 13:39, Jason Nah wrote:
> I have the following defined in my routes file
>
> resources :users
>
> And a controller:
> class UsersController < ApplicationController
> before_filter :load_user
>
> def show
> redirect_to(user_path(@user))
> end
> private
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 22:08, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> I had used Fixtures and factory girl for preloading of data in earlier
> version rspec.
> Is there any new thing for loading of data in rspec 2 or do we have to
> use the same.
I have a spec/fixtures/ directory containing YAML files with
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:47, Rich Price wrote:
> I was using rspec 2.4.0 to test some code
> and it was working fine then suddenly I get
>
> rich@richlaptop2:~/Documents/fakemap/rspec$ rspec block.rb
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require':
> ../code/fmut
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:53, SpringChicken
wrote:
> I've just spent a day trying to write up a basic update spec for a
> nested resource - all without avail. I'm quite new to RSpec & not sure
> what I'm doing wrong. I can't seem to get a stub that recognises the
> required association to th
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 21:48, Michael Guterl wrote:
> RSpec::Matchers.define :deliver do |message|
> chain :with do |*args|
> @with = args
> end
>
> match do |mailer|
> mail = double
> mail.should_receive(:deliver)
>
> mailer.should_receive(message).with(*@with).and_return(mai
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 19:33, Cezar Halmagean wrote:
> So I am trying to spec a nested model / form like say Post has_many Comments
> and in order to build a nested form I need to build a new comment in
> @posts.comments like so:
> @post = Post.new
> @post.comments.build
> Now, my question i
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 05:29, slavix wrote:
> Struggling with nested routing and rspec...
> When I run spec/controllers/admin/website_users_controller_spec.rb
>
> describe Admin::WebsiteUsersController do
> ...
> get :index, :website => @website
Does that need to be:
get :index, :website
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 02:31, Fearless Fool wrote:
> I have a Premise model with an after_create method, along the lines of:
>
> class Premise < ActiveRecord::Base
> ...
> after_create :etl_attributes
> ...
> end
>
> In production code, etl_attributes accesses the web. For testing I'm
>
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 15:30, DBA wrote:
> I was just starting a rails 3.0.5 application with rspec-rails 2.5.0
> and ruby 1.9.2-p180 and when I went to describe my controller I ran
> into this undefined method 'get' error.
>
> Here's the spec that is causing the problem (which lives in the f
Hi,
On Mar 13, 2011 10:11 PM, "David Chelimsky" wrote:
> The `get` method is available in examples (the block passed to `it` or
`specify`), but here it's being called in a group (the block passed to
`describe` or context`).
Yeah, don't know how I missed that!
Mike
__
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 19:25, Clint wrote:
> I am kind of confused, why this code is behaving the way it does.
> In a test, I wrote something like this:
>
> it "should do something" do
> @some = Factory(:some)
> initial_object = @some
>
> #do something with @some. e.g. update attributes et
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 16:56, Paul S. wrote:
> I have an Address model that has a before_validation callback that goes
> off and geocodes the address.
>
> I'm concerned that for all the tests in my Address model I'm going to be
> triggering that callback, even when it's not what I'm testing.
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 00:02, dblock wrote:
> I have an odd problem. I got controllers in a namespace and
> controllers outside of the namespace. For example, I have a
> PagesController and a Admin::PagesController.
>
> When I run rspec from the top, tests pass and I get the following
> warn
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 05:32, planon wrote:
> I'm running into this error while trying to run a unit test on a
> Mongoid database:
>
> def show
> id=params[:id]
> @user=User.find(:first,id)
> end
>
> My test
>
> before(:each) do
> @user = Fabricate(:user)
> sign_in @user
> en
Hi,
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 02:28, S Ahmed wrote:
> I want my tests to fail if I rename a method in my /lib folder in a rails
> app.
>
> Say I have a class like:
>
> /lib
> /lib/formatter.rb
>
> class Formatter
> def self.do_transforms(text)
> text
> end
> end
>
>
> And say I reference
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 09:53, John Hinnegan wrote:
> I'm testing methods in my ApplicationController using anonymous controller
> class (not sure if that's relevant). I've somehow broken something such
> that I do not have access to the routing variables that rails generates.
>
> So rather t
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 09:42, Patrick J. Collins
wrote:
> I just spent a lot of time trying to get a test to pass that would not pass no
> matter what I did, and I finally decided to just do something really simple to
> verify that even that was working-- and it's not.
>
> class PostsControl
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:55, Mohamad El-Husseini
wrote:
> The following are what I believe two ways of doing the same thing. Only the
> first example fails, while the latter passes.
In your failing example:
context "generates a unique password_reset_token each time" do
let(:user)
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 20:46, Mohamad El-Husseini
wrote:
> Thanks, Mike. I appreciate the explanation. It's tricky knowing what runs
> when, and what variable is in what scope. It seems like "code smell" to add
> an instance variable to the before block.
>
> I don't understand what advantage
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 22:10, Mike Mazur wrote:
> In May last year, the controller specs generated with `rspec g
> scaffold` were changed to use real model objects instead of
> `mock_model`.
>
> I'm curious why this change was made?
As soon I sent this email off, I noti
Hi,
In May last year, the controller specs generated with `rspec g
scaffold` were changed to use real model objects instead of
`mock_model`[1].
I'm curious why this change was made? Searching the rspec-users
mailing list archives didn't turn up anything, and rspec-devel
archives I found finish in
24 matches
Mail list logo
