On 26 Aug 2009, at 19:57, Chuck Remes wrote:
I'm trying to setup some specs (really just assertions) that verify
some callbacks are executed in response to COM events. In the
WIN32OLE_EVENT class you may subscribe to a COM event and have it
delivered to you for processing. Syntax looks lik
On 27 Aug 2009, at 17:02, Chuck Remes wrote:
On Aug 27, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 26 Aug 2009, at 19:57, Chuck Remes wrote:
I'm trying to setup some specs (really just assertions) that
verify some callbacks are executed in response to COM events. In
the WIN32OLE_
On 28 Aug 2009, at 19:44, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
Hello list,
Since stubs don't set expectations, do we have any use-case where
stubbing like this makes sense:
@mock.stub!(:method).with(anything()).and_return(@collection).
It is clear that and_return is the value from stubbing, but
On 1 Sep 2009, at 19:44, Rick DeNatale wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Carl Graff wrote:
Of less importance:
Actually I have considered creating/converting these integration
applications as full blown Rails applications since they definitely
have a
model and controller aspect and
On 1 Sep 2009, at 21:11, Jeremy Hageman wrote:
As someone relatively new to rspec, I am interested in hearing the
wisdom of the group in the area of using a fixture replacement gem
(such as machinist or factory girl) instead of mocking the model. To
me it seems that using a fixture replacement,
On 3 Sep 2009, at 04:29, amkirwan wrote:
What is the best way to spec nested partials in rails? Here is the
generic type of nesting I am trying to spec.
new.html.erb
edit.html.erb
_outer_partial.html.erb
_inner_partial.html.erb
Can you be any more specific about the behaviour you wa
On 11 Sep 2009, at 21:28, Giuseppe Bertini wrote:
Hello list,
this should be an easy one, but I seem to be stuck.
What is the proper way to mimic a POST request for a named, non-
RESTful
route?
here's the route and the rest of the setup:
map.accept_invitation '/accept_invitation/:id', :cont
On 22 Sep 2009, at 06:34, Mithun Perera wrote:
Mithun Perera wrote:
Hi all,
I am an university student and these days i am on training period.
So i
want to know about ruby on on rails "cucumber and Rspec". If somebody
know about these fields please help me. If not please send me an
tutorial
On 25 Sep 2009, at 08:07, Mithun Perera wrote:
Mithun Perera wrote:
Mithun Perera wrote:
Hi all,
I am an university student and these days i am on training period.
So i
want to know about ruby on on rails "cucumber and Rspec". If
somebody
know about these fields please help me. If not pl
On 30 Sep 2009, at 06:53, Mithun Perera wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to do testing using Rspec. But i have no idea about
that . so
i need good tutorial for that. if anybody has such tutorials please
help me by sending them.
thanks,
mithun
http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2007/05/14/an-introduc
On 1 Oct 2009, at 00:56, Hates_ wrote:
I currently have:
describe Publishers::PagesController
I want to be able to grab the path "publishers/pages/ and use that to
generate a load of tests automatically. Problem is I can't figure out
how to do it outside of my "it" block.
Any help is greatly
On 2 Oct 2009, at 17:16, Sam Treweek wrote:
I want to be able to execute only 1 row in an Scenario/Outline Example
table. Is there a method already created for me to access. I have
certain validation rules for only running 1 row of data coming from an
external request to execute cuke.
So havin
On 5 Oct 2009, at 09:49, Zoltan Penzeli wrote:
I have no idea if this will work, but you could try to sense for the
table row you want to skip in a Before block, then call skip_invoke!
on it:
Before(scenario_or_example_row) do
if the_one_to_skip?(scenario_or_example_row)
scenario_or_ex
On 14 Oct 2009, at 20:49, Scott Taylor wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Joaquin Rivera Padron wrote:
hello there,
how do you tipically spec private methods? The thing is Ï have
something like this:
You have a few options:
1. Make the method public in the object you are testing
2. Make
On 14 Oct 2009, at 22:33, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 14 Oct 2009, at 20:49, Scott Taylor wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Joaquin Rivera Padron wrote:
hello there,
how do you tipically spec private methods? The thing is Ï have
something like this:
You have a few options:
1. Make the
You're getting mixed up between stubbing the methods on the class
(Brand) and the instance (Brand.new)
Try the corrections below:
On 16 Oct 2009, at 05:25, Elza wrote:
I am starting with Rspec and I am having some errors in the Get/index
Can someone help me with this?
describe BrandsContro
On 21 Oct 2009, at 17:31, Elza wrote:
How can I spec the 3rd line of my controller?
What does that method do to the other objects in your domain? Can you
describe that behaviour easily using mocks and stubs?
If not, you would be best to move the method out of the controller and
onto an
Hi Carl,
Some thoughts below...
On 21 Oct 2009, at 18:12, Carl Graff wrote:
Well i just started using RSpec about a week ago and mostly I was
just trying to learn how to use mocks as I could have easily just
created the real object in this case.
Anyway, I had a real object, that needed to
I did have a crack at writing some 'ground rules' a while back after
we had quite a bit of chump-traffic:
http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/get-in-touch
It would be good to have a single URL we can reply with when people
send these kind of feckless requests. Maybe the problem with that
On 2 Nov 2009, at 14:19, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Nov 2, 2009, at 3:35 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
Following is the scenario.
describe BbPostsController, "POST Create" do
context "Admin" do
fixtures :users, :bb_posts, :user_channels, :channels,
:channel_features
it "should save post" do
On 4 Nov 2009, at 15:56, Andrew Premdas wrote:
2009/10/29 nruth
Hi Guys
I'm going to put the cat amongst the pigeons here in the hope of some
clarity falling out of the sky on me.
My question is this: In a world with Cucumber what is the value of
view specs?
In the community (railscamp, for
On 9 Nov 2009, at 11:13, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
Hello,
I had written some model scenarios.
Now i want to generate that output in an html file.
i am executing the models using rake i.e. rake spec:models from spec
directory.
But the html file is not getting generated.
Following is the error trace:
On 6 Nov 2009, at 12:49, David Chelimsky wrote:
In the long run, what I'd like is the following:
* Cucumber features that ship with RSpec become the authoritative
end-user documentation. This is something that anybody can
contribute to with patches, as it's all in files that ship with
RS
On 10 Nov 2009, at 06:46, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
Yes i get an error message as rake aborted.
spec/models/survey_spec.rb" --format html:result.html failed
Have you looked in the survey_spec.rb file to see if there's a problem
then? Does the 'error message' give you a line number to look at?
On 18 Nov 2009, at 18:39, David Nawara wrote:
This thread should be titled: "rspec-rails gem changing connection
adapter?"
I did some puts's and found that something is changing the connection
adapter to ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SQLite3Adapter, from my
specified ActiveRecord::Connecti
On 24 Nov 2009, at 11:01, Peter Ritchie wrote:
Peter Ritchie wrote:
Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
Stuck as to what dependency is calling for cucumber 0.4.4 -
config/environments/cucumber.rb?
(Failing that - search for the string "0.4.4" among your project's
files)
we want to
stick to 0.4.3 but C
+1
And have a coding dojo ASAP. It's much easier to learn when you're
having fun.
On 25 Nov 2009, at 18:07, Pat Maddox wrote:
Pair with them. How big's the team? Lots of ways you can do this.
If there are 5 other devs, you can pair with one each day, bam,
training in a week. If there are
On 25 Nov 2009, at 16:02, Krasimir Angelov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using rspec-caching-test-plugin to test caching (obviously) in
my controller specs. Because views are also involved in caching
integrate_views have to be turned On.
The problem comes when mock is passed to a helper, for examle
On 26 Nov 2009, at 02:31, Zhenning Guan wrote:
I have a user_observer, code like this:
def after_create(user)
UserMailer.deliver_signup_notification(user)
user.random_key = random_key_method
user.save
end
before do
@user = mock_model(User)
@user_observer = UserObserver.instance
end
I should try asking about this on
http://groups.google.com/group/sporkgem
On 28 Nov 2009, at 00:52, Martin wrote:
I forgot to tell you the versions I'm using:
spork: 0.7.3
rspec: 1.2.9
rails: 2.3.5
Hi,
I'm running into a problem with spork:
The helper methods in app/helpers/simpler_helper.r
On 8 Dec 2009, at 22:04, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
I would like to be able to write a custom matcher so that I could
call this test, for instance:
@user.should be_allowed_to_visit(url)
@non_welcome.should_not be_allowed_to_visit(url)
The matcher would call Webrat methods such as 'visit
On 9 Dec 2009, at 19:16, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 09/12/2009, a las 19:15, David Chelimsky escribió:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Pat Maddox > wrote:
[...@admin, @allowed_user].should all(be_allowed_to_visit(url))
[...@admin, @allowed_user].should all_be_allowed_to_visit(url)
On Dec
On 10 Dec 2009, at 00:53, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
Matt Wynne escreveu:
On 8 Dec 2009, at 22:04, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
I would like to be able to write a custom matcher so that I could
call this test, for instance:
@user.should be_allowed_to_visit(url
if they wanted some help with that.
[1]http://segment7.net/projects/ruby/drb/introduction.html
[2]http://fitnesse.org/FitNesse.UserGuide.SliM
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 6 Nov 2009, at 12:49, David Chelimsky wrote:
[3]http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/blob/master/featu
Let's move this bit of the discussion over to the cukes mailing list.
Are you on that list Ed?
On 11 Dec 2009, at 22:29, Ed Howland wrote:
BTW, does Cuke's wire protocol allow for a mixture of Ruby side and
SUT side step definitions?
Yes. With Cucumber you can implement steps in a mixture o
On 16 Dec 2009, at 16:56, Stefan Kanev wrote:
Hey guys.
I switched completely to RSpec and Cucumber this spring and I am
really happy with. While I think I've gotten quite good with it, I'm
not sure I understand the value of spec'ing controllers (in Rails).
I would appreciate if you can
On 23 Dec 2009, at 10:07, Gnagno Gnagno wrote:
Sorry, I have one more question,
I didn't find the cucumber forum, so please forgive me if I am too
much
out of topic here.
http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/get-in-touch
I was trying to achieve the same with cucumber, so I wrot
On 24 Dec 2009, at 06:09, Doug wrote:
after upgrading cucumber to 5.1 be_true and be_false are undefined
switching to == true or == false works.
??? thanks.
The rails integration changed quite a bit for that release. See [1]
plus a few recent threads on this list.
It sounds like your sp
Look at your rails logs very carefully and see what's going on, paying
special attention to each call to BEGIN TRANSACTION, COMMIT
TRANSACTION. When this has happened to me in the past, it was because
I had a call to ActiveRecord::Base.connection to do some dirty raw SQL
query, and those ca
On 30 Dec 2009, at 22:31, Ashley Moran wrote:
Wasn't expecting you to drop everything and build a matcher hosting
platform :)
I think he should. It is Christmas, and it's not like David ever does
anything else for the community ;)
cheers,
Matt
http://mattwynne.net
+447974 430184
__
Subclass it in your spec with
class TestController < Admin::BaseController
def index
end
end
...then use the TestController in your tests for Admin::BaseController.
That might mean you'll need to add special routing for TestController
which is annoying but can be done.
On 5 Jan 2010,
On 5 Jan 2010, at 12:17, Matt Patterson wrote:
On 9 Nov 2009, at 22:03, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 6 Nov 2009, at 12:49, David Chelimsky wrote:
In the long run, what I'd like is the following:
* Cucumber features that ship with RSpec become the authoritative
end-user documentation. Th
On 7 Jan 2010, at 07:22, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 07/01/2010, a las 03:53, Phillip Koebbe escribió:
Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
Well, there is more than one way to skin a cat, but the thing I
like about my proposed solution is that:
- the specification of the behavior appears in the "desc
On 9 Jan 2010, at 12:02, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:37 PM, DeNigris Sean
wrote:
Hi list,
I'm writing an example for a class that represents the "pickaxe" e-
book, which I view in Preview.app:
describe PickaxeBook do
...
it "should tell whether it's ready to re
On 12 Jan 2010, at 22:40, rogerdpack wrote:
Question.
Currently rspec appears to allow for a two-step test system, like
context "abc"
it 'should do y' do
end
end
It might be convenient to have an arbitrary number of nests, like
context "abc"
it 'should do y' do
it 'should also be able
On 28 Jan 2010, at 21:14, Paul Hinze wrote:
Ashley Moran on 2010-01-28 at 13:28:
On Jan 28, 2010, at 1:29 pm, Paul Hinze wrote:
I believe the lack of ability to use this notation comes down to a
ruby
limitation, but I'm not sure. If that's the case, then we would
need a
specific argume
On 28 Jan 2010, at 21:43, Nicolás Sanguinetti wrote:
You're definitely testing too much implementation and not enough
behavior.
Basically, what you want to spec, is that provided some options, when
you call a certain method of your form builder, you get a certain html
output. At least that's
On 30 Jan 2010, at 06:45, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:54 PM, rogerdpack
wrote:
As a note of feedback, when I do a spec --help, I saw this line...
-e, --example [NAME|FILE_NAME] Execute example(s) with matching
name(s). If the argument is
On 1 Feb 2010, at 14:53, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
Agreed:
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/blob/master/features/command_line/example_name_option.feature
Thanks, David.
I don't want to sound all gushy or anything, but you have got to be
one of the most helpful, cou
On 1 Feb 2010, at 15:14, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
I have just recently started creating some plugins, mainly of the
controller variety. I have been looking for a tutorial or other
documentation detailing how to go about testing these plugins with
RSpec, but have not yet found anything helpful
One way would be to use an environment variable:
$ CUSTOMER=foo spec spec
Then read out the customer name in your specs:
login = ENV['CUSTOMER']
Otherwise, I would guess you might be able to look at ARGV from
within, say, spec_helper.rb but I've never tried it.
On 3 Feb 2010, at 03
On 3 Feb 2010, at 11:35, J. B. Rainsberger wrote:
I find this rule of thumb helpful: stub unless you're certain to want
to verify this time that the client invoke the server correctly, and
never, never mock multiple methods at once.
Right, because the mock (should_receive) is an assertion, an
On 4 Feb 2010, at 14:09, J. B. Rainsberger wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 00:12, David Mitchell
wrote:
What is the 'best practice' way to structure RSpec code and
documentation
when testing a very large project, where the RSpec code base has to
be
maintained and extended over a long per
On 8 Feb 2010, at 02:34, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
Matt Wynne wrote:
On 1 Feb 2010, at 15:14, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
I have just recently started creating some plugins, mainly of the
controller variety. I have been looking for a tutorial or other
documentation detailing how to go about
On 8 Feb 2010, at 16:53, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Phillip Koebbe > wrote:
Matt Wynne wrote:
Yeah, you need to convince RSpec that the describe blocks you're
using are
describing an ExampleGroup that's about a Rails Controller, then
it will mix
On 11 Feb 2010, at 04:46, Alex Satrapa wrote:
I'm sure this has been covered before, but after some time all I've
been able to find on the intarwebs are references to the use of code
coverage tests to identify code that is not used by any current tests.
I guess the assumption is that you'v
On 18 Feb 2010, at 16:25, m...@franklakatos.com wrote:
I know we are suppose to keep specs obvious and readable, but is it
normal (or there any opposition) to stubbing every method call that
you needed in a before block and simply over-riding the same method
with a should_receive in the ac
On 18 Feb 2010, at 19:33, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
Hello guys,
I was spec'ing a model and just tried to do something like this
it "should create a payment with period_start & period_end set
correctly" do
it "should create a new payment for an approved transaction"
On 19 Feb 2010, at 08:59, Erik Pukinskis wrote:
Hello Specmeisters!
I have a bit of a philosophical question for the TDD witches and
wizards out there. I'm working on some code that is really
churning... It's doing complicated calculations, but the actual
desired results are a moving target.
I keep wanting to do this, and I don't think it's possible so I
thought I'd suggest it. Similarly to the way I can specify stub values
as hash key/value pairs when constructing a test double, I'd like to
be able to the same when subsequently calling stub on that double:
me.stub(:name =>
On 20 Feb 2010, at 23:22, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Matt Wynne
wrote:
I keep wanting to do this, and I don't think it's possible so I
thought I'd
suggest it. Similarly to the way I can specify stub values as hash
key/value
pairs when cons
On 22 Feb 2010, at 19:45, Harm wrote:
Hi,
I have an issue with rSpec when spec'ing a module. The module in
question looks like this:
module Sheep
def self.sound
@sound ||= produce_sound()
end
end
This module is used all around the application (and corresponding
specs) and somehow values
On 23 Feb 2010, at 17:30, Scott Taylor wrote:
Has there been any development on shared helpers /
it_should_behave_like feature in rspec?
I forget the reasons, but I remember a patch for something like this
was rejected:
it_should_behave_like "an_entry", :locals => { :entry =>
Entr
On 23 Feb 2010, at 19:11, rlw wrote:
and still get the output of accumulated errors?
My environment is awful, slow, and not modifiable. (Just don't go
there! At least I get to program in Ruby, which makes up for
everything else.) So when I see some errors in a 300 example test
file, it takes a
http://groups.google.com/group/rspec
On 24 Feb 2010, at 06:54, Diwakar, ANGLER - EIT wrote:
I need a look on a definition given for rspec and cucumber earlier
by a member in rspec group. Where can I find it
Regards,
Diwakar
___
rspec-users mailing
Do you mean --format specdoc ?
On 25 Feb 2010, at 15:29, rogerdpack wrote:
I'm trying to find a spec parameter that will do something like the
following
$ spec file.spec
Spec: running "it should pass spec x"
.
Spec: running "it should pass spec y"
.
That type of thing.
The use case is that
On 2 Mar 2010, at 21:05, Adam R wrote:
An update for this issue. This script works, but only if I
explicitly define
the array that I'm iterating over (][countryname, url]].each do,
rather than
@countries.each do).
Can someone help me understand why my array here (@countries) is not
reco
You could use something like NullDb to achieve this, I think:
http://www.slideshare.net/bmabey/disconnecting-the-database-with-activerecord
On 3 Mar 2010, at 20:43, Stefan Kanev wrote:
It took a while, but now I an totally convinced that controller
specs should not access the database and stu
On 15 Mar 2010, at 12:34, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:24 AM, jollyroger
wrote:
Hey guys,
unfortunately I've got one more issue with rspec right now.
It seems like rspec isnt properly cleaning up the database after each
spec.
I have the following spec:
On 23 Mar 2010, at 17:43, Patrick J. Collins wrote:
Ok,
So... My first attempt at specing a method in my photo model didn't
go so
well..
http://gist.github.com/341447
Both of these tests are failing, and I am not even sure if I am
structuring
this anywhere near correct or not...
In o
On 1 Apr 2010, at 21:35, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Apr 1, 2010, at 3:14 PM, drewB wrote:
Occasionally, I find myself in a situation where I want to have a
mock
obj returned if a method is called with a particular argument but
handled normally otherwise. For example, lets say I have a Model
pain many times :)
This book is a great read when you're working with other people's crap:
http://www.amazon.com/Working-Effectively-Legacy-Michael-Feathers/dp/0131177052
On Apr 1, 1:45 pm, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 1 Apr 2010, at 21:35, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Apr 1, 2010, at 3:14
When I started programming Ruby and I wanted abstract classes I would
raise an exception in the initialize method telling the client that
they were trying to instantiate an abstract class. That was my best
attempt at self-documenting code at the time.
Nowadays, however, when I have behaviou
Here's an idea relevant to this discussion that came up last week when
I did a talk on Cucumber to ScotRUG.
Paul Wilson was describing how he used to use Fit, back in the day,
for testing at different levels in the stack rather than just for end-
to-end tests. The idea was to surface the tes
On 27 Apr 2010, at 10:36, Martin DeMello wrote:
I have a series of tests I want to automate, which involve running
shell scripts in a "live" environment (i.e. nothing mocked or
stubbed), and then verifying the state of the system. I thought that,
even though it doesn't fit the classic definitio
On 27 Apr 2010, at 22:51, Patrick J. Collins wrote:
Hi,
What if they didn't? Is there a different way you could design this
so
that the interesting bits (The small methods) didn't depend so much
on
the other bits around them?
Well this is for importing vCards...
http://gist.github.com/
On 29 Apr 2010, at 18:48, James H wrote:
Greetings.
My team at work is trying to decide between Cucumber and RSpec
integration tests for all future integration-style testing. The team
is divided on this, so I thought I'd approach the community to see
what the future of RSpec integration tests
You might want to try running the specs with --format specdoc so you can do a
better post mortem. Also remember you can look at log/test.log to see what was
happening when it hung.
On 8 May 2010, at 20:59, RFine wrote:
> I'm responsible for a relatively large RoR application, and have been
> st
On 13 May 2010, at 12:41, Ants Pants wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Hello and welcome :)
> I'm just working my way through the RSpec/Cucumber book, I love the tool but
> not so much the learning curve :(
>
> Starting with my first view, is it okay for me, in the BDD world, to do the
> following or
On 16 May 2010, at 18:54, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with an automated test-case
> generation tool like Quickcheck (for erlang/haskell). I'd be interested in
> hearing any impressions, war stories, or dev workflows regarding a tool like
>
On 19 May 2010, at 22:11, Myron Marston wrote:
> On my current rails project we're using both rspec and cucumber.
> We've been diligent about keeping our specs as true unit tests, using
> nulldb and mocking/stubbing to disconnect the specs from the database
> and keep each spec focused on the cla
Cursory look at that blog post seems like it's covered most of what's in this
talk, but worth mentioning anyway, it's good:
http://pure-rspec-rubynation.heroku.com/
http://video2010.scottishrubyconference.com/show_video/3/1
On 24 May 2010, at 10:33, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Being p
On 27 May 2010, at 04:44, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On May 26, 2010, at 9:37 PM, Nadal wrote:
>
>> Here is my spec.
>>
>> describe Exception2db do
>> context "attributes" do
>> subject { Exception2db.create(:exception => $exception_data_xml) }
>>
>> specify { subject.controller.should == 'e
Did you try looking at the specs for any examples? I imagine there'd be a
couple... ;)
Joseph DelCioppio wrote:
>I've been looking through the RSpec source to better understand how
>RSpec works and I've got a question about the functionality of stub!.
>I noticed that you can pass a symbol to st
On 7 Jun 2010, at 15:13, Ben Butler-Cole wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm trying to use RSpec's mocks to describe code which passes a block to a
> collaborator. I want to write an assertion against the value returned by the
> block. I can't find any explicit support for this in RSpec, but perhaps I
>
On 7 Jun 2010, at 15:56, Ben Butler-Cole wrote:
> On 7 June 2010 15:25, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> Have you seen and_yield? I can't quite get my head around what you're trying
> to do, but it might help anyway
>
> Thank you, I have. My understanding is that #and_yield
On 7 Jun 2010, at 16:52, Ben Butler-Cole wrote:
> On 7 June 2010 16:34, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> I'm still not quite clear what you're trying to achieve. Do you want to
> assert that a specific block is passed to the collaborator, or do you want to
> assert that any ol
On 11 Jun 2010, at 23:54, juange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was doing some testing to mi controller and a error raise, and it's
> driving me crazy. This are the lines that I wanna test:
>
>@cloning_vector = CloningVector.new(params[:cloning_vector])
>@cloning_vector.sequence = Sequence.new(para
On 16 Jun 2010, at 15:11, Jarmo Pertman wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I wanted to include module into ExampleGroup to write less code within
> examples, but was unable to do so. This seems to be strange, because
> in regular Class it works and all methods within that module are also
> accessible. See the
On 16 Jun 2010, at 15:20, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> On 16 Jun 2010, at 15:11, Jarmo Pertman wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I wanted to include module into ExampleGroup to write less code within
>> examples, but was unable to do so. This seems to be strange, because
>
On 19 Jun 2010, at 00:35, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
>> Hi David, thanks for the reply,
>>
>> Hmm, considering we have:
>> 1) The ruby process where the spec is running
>> 2) A mongrel server serving request (test environment)
>>
>>
On 29 Jun 2010, at 06:54, aslak hellesoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Brandon Olivares
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently upgraded to Rails 3 beta, a few weeks ago. One thing I would
>> really like to do is to develop components of my application, because some
>> of them I'd really l
On 5 Jul 2010, at 08:00, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been unhappy with routing specs for a long time now and last night when
> updating some old 1.3 specs for 2.0 I decided to see if I could come up with
> something that didn't make me feel unhappy.
>
> Principal causes of un
On 12 Jul 2010, at 06:43, Kevin wrote:
> Awesome discussion you've started here, very fun read for a new rspec
> follower.
>
> Just wanted to throw in that I've found setting a
> "cattr_accessor :current_user" in the user model to hold the current
> user to be very handy in terms of simplifying
On 14 Jul 2010, at 15:26, Chuck Remes wrote:
> I find myself using this pattern quite a bit.
>
> rspec 1.30
> ruby 1.9.1, 1.9.2-rc2, jruby 1.51 all on osx 10.6.4
>
> class Foo
> def initialize
>@bar = Bar.new
> end
> end
>
> context "init" do
> it "should allocate a helper class Bar" do
On 15 Jul 2010, at 14:55, Chuck Remes wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
>>
>> You can do this, by using a test spy to remember the value of foo passed
>> into the stubbed constructor and then later comparing it:
>>
>>
On 16 Jul 2010, at 10:45, Tom Stuart wrote:
> On 16 Jul 2010, at 10:29, Matt Wynne wrote:
>>> For those following along at home, this exact technique did not work. The
>>> +actual_foo+ variable was holding some mock value instead of the real self
>>> value.
>&
On 18 Jul 2010, at 00:10, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Costa Shapiro wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been thinking of how to express my idea in code, but since I've never
>> been involved in RSpec development, I'd better have some feedback here first.
>> The feature sugg
On 19 Jul 2010, at 11:38, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
> El 19/07/2010, a las 10:58, Matt Wynne escribió:
>
>> On 18 Jul 2010, at 00:10, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 17, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Costa Shapiro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
On 19 Jul 2010, at 19:05, Walther Diechmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my question unwields me as a complete noob - which is okay - but I
> apologize for this totally basic question <:)
>
> I've bought the PragProg Rspec Book and googled, been reading blogs and
> what-have-I-not, but nowhere have I been
1 - 100 of 642 matches
Mail list logo
