Hi,
Thanks for all the effort that has gone into making RSpec available.
I'm not a professional developer and I've found the approach
articulated has helped me a lot in writing my code, and understanding
that of others.
To cut my teeth, I'm trying to write an db adapter for the og project.
I've b
mocking. If you
> want/need to use another mocking framework, I know that Mocha and RSpec play
> well. Not sure about FlexMock.
Thanks Chris that is good to know.
Regards
Mark
>
> Chris Pratt
>
>
>
> On 9/11/07, Mark Van De Vyver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
Hi,
On 9/17/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/16/07, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While the spirit of BDD is to spec first and code second, many of us
> > have legacy code. Worse, some of us have legacy code without very
> > good coverage. Recognizing that *I* have such
On 9/21/07, Dan North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Although it would be nice (and not too difficult) to have the example
> runner intercept any class creation (and perhaps other global/constant
> definitions) and undef them after each example.
>
> It certainly seems reasonable to have any defin
Hi,
Googling 'RSpec describe scope' didn't yield much, so apologies if
this question has been dealt with.
It seem well known that a ruby class is 'visible' between describes,
and if this is a problem then you should use some counter as prefix or
suffix:
'class Item_001; ... end'
Is there any work
Hi,
Thanks for the prompt responses...
On Nov 22, 2007 1:18 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 1:07 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Googling 'RSpec describe scope' didn't yield much, so apologie
On Nov 22, 2007 8:53 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for the prompt responses...
>
> On Nov 22, 2007 1:18 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 21, 2007 1:07 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Nov 22, 2007 9:01 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/21/07, Mark Van De Vyver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Thanks for the prompt responses...
> >
> > On Nov 22, 2007 1:18 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>