on
> ID for the Safari requests is a new 32 character string for every request,
> and for FireFox requests it's the same 128 character string for every
> request.
>
> I'm using Ruby on Rails 2.0.2. I hope I'm not forgetting some other useful
> piece of info.
> Whoops, you're very right, this isn't the RoR list! Oh well it's the
> only one I ever use. My bad! Let's look at it this way... my spec's
> are failing because I can't use session! What do I do? :)
Stub like there's no
is? Add a -profiling
command-line flag to spec itself? Is there a single point of entry and
exit for running individual specs that I can put the code around? It's
currently manually hacked onto each example group individually and it
seems a bit untidy.
--
Giles Bowkett
Podcast: http:/
> Hey Giles, we've already done this for you!
>
> spec some_directory --format profile
>
> This will print out the 10 slowest examples (regardless of threshold).
>
> Cheers, and welcome to the RSpec community!
Doh! Gracias. :-)
--
Giles Bowkett
Podcast: http://holly
econds to run, which was just nuts.
--
Giles Bowkett
Podcast: http://hollywoodgrit.blogspot.com
Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com
Portfolio: http://www.gilesgoatboy.org
Tumblelog: http://giles.tumblr.com
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-user
improve my speccing approach so I can operate
with greater certainty. I think probably this approach is a good
direction, and that I should change the specs by making them more
specific. (For instance, there are places where I check that a
Generator subclass can do stuff, even t
probably done enough question
marks but basically, is there a good set of guiding principles I can
use to apply RSpec well in unconventional contexts?
--
Giles Bowkett
Podcast: http://hollywoodgrit.blogspot.com
Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com
Portfolio: h
you said you are doing.
Yes. Sorry about the Great American Novel - that is pretty much what I'm doing.
--
Giles Bowkett
Podcast: http://hollywoodgrit.blogspot.com
Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com
Portfolio: http://www.gilesgoatboy.org
Tumblelog: http://giles.tumblr.com
_
fect - but I'm finding the output
somewhere between weird and incomprehensible. What's going on? Is
RSpec doing some initialization as well, so that my initialization
monkey-patch screws with its head?
--
Giles Bowkett
Podcast: http://hollywoodgrit.blogspot.com
Blog: http://gilesbowket
gt; --
> Rick DeNatale
>
> My blog on Ruby
> http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
> ___
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
--
Giles Bowkett
Podcast: htt
g, does indeed validate. Now if Safari has a
> problem formating it, it's not a validation problem.
>
> On 2/8/08, Giles Bowkett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I hate to do this because it seems almost sadistic, but I encountered
> > some borkage in the feed in
t; --
> Rick DeNatale
>
> My blog on Ruby
> http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
> ___
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
--
Giles Bowkett
Podcast: http://hollywoodgrit.b
s mostly Rails stuff; there's a
lot of controller specs that duplicate model specs instead of stubbing
out the behavior. It's driving me nuts but I have no idea what the
solution is yet.
--
Giles Bowkett
Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com
Portfolio: http://www.
tions.
--
Giles Bowkett
Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com
Portfolio: http://www.gilesgoatboy.org
Tumblelog: http://giles.tumblr.com
Podcast: http://hollywoodgrit.blogspot.com
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforg
14 matches
Mail list logo