www.example.com
Failure/Error: get :index
ActionController::RoutingError:
No route matches {:controller=>"admin/pages"}
$ rake routes
...
admin_pages GET/pages(.:format)
{:action=>"index", :controller=>"admin/pages"}
...
Thank you for any help you can offer,
Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
I apologize if this message was sent more than once, I tried to post
through the Google Groups page but it didn't seem to work.
In order to ensure that my application is not vulnerable to this exploit, I
am trying to create a controller test in RSpec to cover it. In order to do
so, I need to be ab
er?
There is a whole folder of examples with version 1.2.9, but none of them is
an example about how to create a story or scenario. Am I missing an other
lib for stories?
I hope you can help me.
Best regards,
Daniel Varrin
___
rspec-users mailing list
r
Hello, I'm experiencing a weird behavior that I cant find the
solution. My specs that depends on Factory Girl with attachment only
works in command line and not in Textmate with Command+R or Command
+Shift+R.
My app uses rspec 1.3, rspec-rails 1.3.2, factory-girl 1.2.4 and Rails
2.3.5 with papercl
Fixed, the problem was the path of my textmate. The solution is open
preferences, go to advanced/shell variables and make sure that your
PATH entry includes the path of your imagemagick (in my casa, with
homebrew is /usr/local/bin).
On Jun 22, 2:05 am, Daniel Lopes wrote:
> Hello,
d be successful" do
get 'contact'
response.should be_success
end
end
end
$ rake --trace spec
(in /home/daniel/programming/rails_projects/sample_app)
** Invoke spec (first_time)
** Invoke db:test:prepare (first_time)
** Invoke db:abort_if_pendi
On 26 Aug, 15:25, Brennon Bortz wrote:
> Would not having run "rails generate rspec:install" cause this problem?
>
> On 26 Aug 2010, at 14:21, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > On Aug 22, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Daniel Lidström wrote:
>
> >>
> >> So it se
Hello,
I am trying to run my first integration tests of my rails 3
application. All tests fail with an error "stack level too deep". The
tests are intended to verify the link routes and look like this:
dan...@ubuntu/home/daniel/programming/rails_projects/sample_app$ cat
spe
is correct or what to do next. I tried "bundle
install" and then "rspec spec/requests". Capybara was installed but I
still got the stack level too deep error. Could you tell me what to do
or point me to an online resource where this is documented?
Than
capybara.
Thanks for the responses so far. Here's what I have done:
- Switched to beta 20:
dan...@ubuntu/home/daniel/programming/rails_projects/sample_app$ cat
Gemfile
source 'http://rubygems.org'
gem 'rails', '3.0.0.rc'
# Bundle edge Rails instead:
# gem
On 28 Aug, 21:21, Toni Tuominen wrote:
> Have selector is a webrat matcher. If you're not using webrat you
> can't use it. Capybara's matcher is have_css. I suggest you take a
> look at capybara docs.
>
> - Toni
Aha, that makes perfe
with => "foobar"
click_button "Sign up"
page.should have_css("div.flash.success", :text =>
"Welcome")
response.should render_template("user/show")
end.should change(User, :count).by(1)
end
end
end
Th
On Sep 4, 8:41 pm, Daniel Lidström wrote:
> response.should render_template("user/show")
I noticed a mistake on the above line. However, the correct line (with
"users/show") also fails:
dan...@ubuntu /home/daniel/programming/bowling (signing-up) $ ls app/
vi
I am following the rails tutorial:
http://railstutorial.org/chapters/filling-in-the-layout#top
Basically the test is something like:
spec/requests/layout_links_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'
describe "LayoutLinks" do
it "should have a Home page at '/'" do
get '/'
response.should have_s
:
desc "Run all specs in the spec directory"
RSpec::Core::RakeTask.new('spec') do |t|
t.rspec_opts = %w[--color]
end
Can I specify the spec/ directory as the current directory when
running this task? What is the expert recommendation? Is the d
ry for the confusion.
Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On 10 Nov, 22:50, Rhett Sutphin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
[...]
> As an alternative, you might also consider having a helper like this:
>
> # again, in spec/spec_helper.rb
> def spec_path(path)
> File.expand_path("../spec", __FILE__)
> end
>
> which yo
Hey all,
I'm new to Rspec and I was just wondering what the standard way of
testing nested resources is?
I currently have a Job model which has many Correspondences.
The new action of my CorrespondencesController looks like:
def new
@job = Job.find params[:job_id]
@correspondence = @j
Thanks for your response Pat - I ended up taking the stub_chain method
which got it working. For anyone interested this is my new test:
it "GET new" do
@correspondence = mock_model(Correspondence)
@job.stub_chain(:correspondences,
:build).and_return(@correspondence)
get :new
there a recent improvement that eliminates the need to set up
rspec in config.generators? Or am I missing something?
I'm using Rails 3.0.5 and rspec-rails 2.5.
-- Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
e tutorial:
https://github.com/fortuity/rails3-mongoid-devise/wiki/Tutorial-(Walkthrough)
Hopefully you got it all figured out by now, but if you still need help,
take a look at the tutorial.
-- Daniel
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
r
Someone made some sense out of this.
http://code.dblock.org/warning-toplevel-constant-xyz-referenced-adminxyz
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-u
Hi Lawrence, thanks for the response. Unfortunately, when I try that, I get:
NoMethodError: undefined method `symbolize_keys' for
> "{\"api_token\":0}":String
> /Users/daniel/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-327/gems/actionpack-3.2.11/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb:
Sorry, I just realized you did this as a request spec, not as a controller
spec! That's what I was missing here, thanks!
So is it not possible to do a controller spec with raw data?
On Friday, February 8, 2013 4:01:43 PM UTC-5, lawrence.pit wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
>
I have a step that precompiles assets before specs are run. I don't need
assets for spec groups other than views and integration. Is there a way to
programmatically examine the list of files or specs (groups?) being run
within a Spork.each_run or an RSpec before(:all) block?
Thx
dB.
--
dB. | Mo
he
model rather than it's behaviour. The behaviour is to call @
article.comments and have an array of comments returned.
Any thoughts?
Cheers
Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
way that I can define this so that my views will be executed?
Will this same thing occur for all helper methods that are definied in the
controller?
Cheers
Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On 7/6/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/5/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very new to rspec so please be patient with me.
>
> I've tried to take some of my tests out of the controller specs to check
for
> things th
On 7/6/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/3/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very new to rspec, so if this is not the right forum please let me
> know.
>
> I'm starting to spec my models first in an existing rails
On 7/6/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/6/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/3/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm very new to rspec, so if this is not th
On 7/6/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/6/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/5/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm very new to rspec so please be patient with me.
> >
> > I&#x
On 7/6/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/6/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/6/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/6/07, David Chelimsky < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 7/5/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTE
I want to extract the method for logging in so that I don't have to include
it in each before call.
Is it bad to use a describe block within the rspec_helper in a rails project
for controller tests?
I have in my spec_helper.rb
describe "an authenticated request", :shared => true do
before( :ea
mocks with options passed to them?
Cheers
Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
My Bad... Please ignore
On 7/10/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a mock for my controller test but I can't get it to
recognise the mock.
I use
it "should find all users" do
User.should_receive(:find).with( :all, :limit => 10
My problem:
Mock 'Task_1005' received unexpected message :user_id= with (1)
No matter what I do to try to stub that out it will still fail out and give
me that message.
Here is my spec
describe TasksController, "handling POST /tasks" do
before(:each) do
@task = mock_model(Task, :to_param
Hi,
I've just started to try and spec my application.html.erb layout as one of
the view specs but it totally barfs.
I'm guessing that it's due to the yield statements in the layout.
Any clues as to how to proceed?
Cheers
Daniel
On 7/15/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/14/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just started to try and spec my application.html.erb layout as one
of
> the view specs but it totally barfs.
>
> I'm guessing that it
On 7/15/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/14/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/15/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/14/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> &
On 7/16/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/15/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/14/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/15/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > O
On 7/16/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/15/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/16/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/15/07, David Chelimsky < [EMAIL PROTECTE
ntroller and so
it's not found.
If it's the presence of the session[:user] that tells the before_filter that
your logged in, the you don't need to do the post. In fact you shouldn't
post, since as you found out if you post to login, your posting to the login
action of the controll
On 7/17/07, Ryan Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel N wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/07, *Ryan Tucker* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Ryan Tucker wrote:
> > Thank you in advance for your help. I am relatively new to b
On 7/17/07, Ryan Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel N wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/07, *Ryan Tucker* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Daniel N wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/17/07, *Ryan Tuc
On 7/17/07, Ryan Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel N wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/07, *Ryan Tucker* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Daniel N wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/17/07, *Ryan Tuc
On 7/19/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,
I see examples showing up that look like this:
describe Thing do
before(:each) do
@thing = Thing.new
end
it do
@thing.should be_something
end
end
This will produce output like this:
Thing
- should be something
oups)
# clear up formatter
rspec_options.instance_variable_set(:@o, nil)
# system is now clean (?), and ready to reload specs etc
As you can probably tell, I'm coding without really understanding. This works
well enough for my
needs right now, but please let me know how these thi
--- Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm missing the why. What is the higher-level objective that you're
> trying to accomplish? Seems like you want something like autotest + a
> custom formatter?
The app (www.redcaride.com) has a plugin system with reloading, which lets you
wor
Is it possible to use spec fixtures with Cucumber, and if so, how?
Thanks,
Daniel Higginbotham
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
aslak hellesoy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Daniel Higginbotham
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it possible to use spec fixtures with Cucumber, and if so, how?
>>
>
> Google for cucumber fixtures
>
> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/165215
>
x27;d actually like to be able to
use the fixtures in spec/fixtures , just as I can for plain old specs.
With specs, you can define which fixtures to use in each "describe"
block, using something like
describe TodoList do
fixtures :todo_lists, :todos, :users
it "should return an
Pat Maddox wrote:
> Daniel Higginbotham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> ActiveRecord::Schema.verbose = false
>>> { :name => "blah", :id => 1 },
>>
>> end
>> end
>>
>> Are you similarly able to load your
spec/controllers/properties_controller_spec.rb:21:
So, how is the right way to mock associated records?
Thanks.
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Visite: http://www.area
ned method `stub' for #
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Visite: http://www.areacriacoes.com.br/projects
http://blog.areacriacoes.com.br/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
55 (31) 3077-4560 / 55
"should expose all properties of given user as @properties" do
@user.should_receive(:properties).and_return([mock_property])
get :index
assigns[:properties].should == [mock_property]
end
end
thanks.
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criaçõe
Ashley Moran gave me help in another post that I open by accident when
entries in the group, and now spec passed... But I still would like to
understand more about mocks and stubs that I asked in previous email.
Thanks again and sorry many emails.
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
I think is better create the step ( it will no work ) and then run
script/generate rspec_scaffold Task name:string description:text
cas_link:string
or if you not using rspec:
script/generate scaffold Task name:string description:text cas_link:string
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area
y]
end
end
And my controller code where error refer is:
private
def load_user
@user = User.find(params[:user_id])
if @user.nil?
flash[:notice] = "Registro não encontrado"
redirect_to root_path
end
end
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Cria
:create_from_user)
put :update, :id => "1"
assigns(:property).should equal(@property)
end
But get this error:
The error occurred while evaluating nil.[]
The problem is params and I don't know how is the best way to simulete
params hash ...
Anyone can help?
Tha
elo Horizonte
cep: 30566500
area: 150m
constructed_area: 120m
category: galpão
usage: comercial
owner_code: AS341ADV
garage: 2
description: Casa com 3 quartos
observation:
condominium_value: 0
iptu_value: 90.50
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Desig
#["is not valid"]},
@base=#,
created_at: nil,
updated_at: nil,
contact_email: "te...@hosttest.com">>
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Visite: http://www.areacriacoes.com.br/projects
on my fixtures files? I think I
don't get the message yet in other model spec because this is the fist model
that use properties.yml ( in properties_spec I only use fixtures for users )
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas
eate_tenant
end
it "should create a new instance given valid attributes" do
p properties(:two).errors
properties(:two).should be_valid
# @tenant.errors.should be_empty
end
end
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites
properties(:two).valid?
p properties(:two).errors
# @tenant.errors.should be_empty
end
And my fixtures still the same... I don't know what's happening, when I try
run on console or in browser everything ok... I think is something strange
with fixtures.
Atenciosa
operty raise an error.
And if I mock model on model spec will not be a good thing.
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Visite: http://www.areacriacoes.com.br/projects
http://blog.area
7-7501
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:10 AM, aslak hellesoy
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Daniel Lopes wrote:
>
>> I know... I just don't use create!, in this special case, because it will
>> be more complicate to know what field have the error .
>>
&
ink to any project on github that use factory-girl and rspec ?
Thanks for all help.
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Visite: http://www.areacriacoes.com.br/projects
http://blog.areacriac
ed id in
my yml files everything works.
Crazy. I'm still want to migrate to factory-girl, if anybody has material or
links on github about projects using rspec and factory-girl will help alot.
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Vis
Thanks everybody...
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Visite: http://www.areacriacoes.com.br/projects
http://blog.areacriacoes.com.br/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
55 (31) 3077-4560 / 55
Hello!
I get the following error everytime I try to check the result of previous
step (by the way, I use default result_steps.rb):
undefined local variable or method `response' for
# (NameError)
./features/steps/result_steps.rb:14:in ` /^the (.*) ?request should fail/'
features/authentication/logi
'm quite happy to give up the ability to have before
blocks in the sub-contexts in order to ensure that the expensive operation
is only run once...
Your thoughts most welcome... (including, perhaps, telling me that I'm Doing
It Wrong)
Daniel Tenner
http://www.woobius.com
http://danielten
To answer myself, I've put together the following work-around:
http://www.swombat.com/getting-rspec-beforeall-and-nested-contexts-w
Still, would love to know if there was a better, less hackish way to do it.
Daniel
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Tenner wrote:
> Hi all,
> Li
like a great way to do it, but I
understand why you'd want to get the refactoring out of the way first. With
my temporary hack in place, I can wait.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Zach Moazeni wrote:
>
> Rereading your original email, I'm thinking I may not have en
ping.create( :clip => clip, :book => )
clipping.should_not be_valid
end.should_not change( Clipping, :count )
end
Any hints as to how to do this without using fixtures?
Cheers
Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http
On 7/24/07, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24 Jul 2007, at 14:07, Daniel N wrote:
> Any hints as to how to do this without using fixtures?
I did this literally minutes ago. I don't use fixtures at all,
ever. Instead I put the data in the before block, eg:
des
_with_privacy?( model.clip )
model.errors.add( :clip, "You can't add this item to this book" )
end
end
end
...
end
Any thoughts on what might be causing that?
Cheers
Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On 7/24/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/24/07, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 24 Jul 2007, at 14:07, Daniel N wrote:
>
> > Any hints as to how to do this without using fixtures?
>
> I did this literally minutes ago. I don
On 7/25/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to test some code that has validates each and I've got a very
strange failure
Mock 'Book_1027' expected :store_with_privacy? with (#) but received it with (#)
The Spec
it "should check that a boo
On 7/25/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/24/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/25/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to test some code that has validates each and I've got a
very
> str
association rules and then
this can be checked and kept track of when you are refactoring or
changing code.
Hope that helps.
Regards
Mikel
Thanx Mikel.
I didn't even think of using a uniq on the has_many. I was using a
validates_uniquness_of :scope => 'book_id'
I will def
On 7/25/07, Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel N wrote:
> On 7/25/07, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> There would be a different way.
>>
>> In the idea of "Only test the code you write" all you really need to
&
On 7/25/07, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kyle,
That is a good point. We are after the behaviour, not the implementation.
Regards
Mikel
On 7/25/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/25/07, Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"}) but received it with (no
> args)
>
I'd really like to understand why this isn't working, but I don't really
like it anyway. I mean, I really want to spec that under a particular set
of conditions it renders with a given layout.
I can't imagine I
On 7/28/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to specify that an action should be rendered with a given
> layout
> > one particular spec.
> >
> > What I've got at t
all that is setup.
What would be fantastic is if mock had an option to report calls to
non-existent methods.
Something like mock( User, :report_pending_methods => :true )
Is there another way to do this that is already in practice?
Cheers
Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On 7/30/07, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I find myself doing the same thing... the, open the model and type in
> the it shoulds...
I think it would need to do a bit more.
If I call mock_model( User ) and the User class doesn't exist yet that will
blow it up.
I guess at that poi
ed to be defined. This seems to be
the spec for Thing, but if in a view I said
it "should do_stuff if @thing is alive" do
@thing = mock_model( Thing )
@thing.stub!( :alive? ).and_return( true )
controller.should_receive( :do_stuff )
do_get
end
How do I run the view first without Thing, and also keep track of alive?
being decalred on the Thing instance?
-Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On 7/30/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/30/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/30/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 7/30/07, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I fi
On 7/30/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/30/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/30/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 7/30/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 7/30/07,
ould do stuff" do
pending( "Don't run this yet" )
# specs go here for unimplemented feature
end
HTH
Daniel
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On 8/1/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/31/07, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 8/1/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I absolutely love the unimplemented spec idea, and ten
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to setup a spec structure for plugins. I'm
getting pretty lost in figuring out how to isolate a plugin enviornment
emulating rails, but not actually being reflected upon the current rails
project.
What I mean is this, let's say I have a comment plugin. This has
1 def create
2 @user = User.new(params[:user])
3 @user.save!
4 self.current_user = @user
5 redirect_to user_path(@user)
6 flash[:notice] = "Thanks for signing up!"
7 rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid
8 render :action => 'new'
9 end
I can't seem to properly s
It's redirecting to /users/1 so it's not causing a fail on the exception,
which I don't know why. My question is how to properly do this in rSpec?
On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does it redirect instead?
>
> On 8/8/07, Fischer, Daniel
users@rubyforge.org
> > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
> > ___
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
>
gt; 13554}
could become.
@category = mock_model( Category, :id => 1 ) # Not sure where this one is
used other than the call to put
@image = mock_model( Image, :id => 2 )
@image.should_receive( :save! ).once.with( :any_args ).and_return( true )
Image.stub!( :find ).and_return( @image )
p
Please let us know when it's updated :)
On 9/10/07, Bryan Liles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 8, 2007, at 5:59 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > Hi all, I got some help from James Edward Gray II on the RSpec
> > TextMate bundle. For those of you who don't know James, he runs the
> > Ruby
So is it just me, or is the new rspec bundle not working as intended when
using the "run" shortcuts?
shift + cmd + r doesn't work. (brings up ruby execution)
cmd + r doesn't work. (brings up ruby execution)
and option + cmd + r brings up a filter dialog
They do work if I select it manually throug
Okay, I've never "selected" a bundle before. Shouldn't the bundle
automatically parse the document to see if it matches that bundle? for
e.ghaving "spec" in the file name? What extra steps am I missing?
On 9/11/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
ortClass was already created on app/models. When I add the following line at
the top of the file it complains about ActiveRecord (uninitialized constant)
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../app/models/report_class'
Thanks in advance,
Daniel
Be smarter than spam. See how sma
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
