Re: [rspec-users] should and != operator

Looks like an rspec bug to me. Bret Willy Mene wrote: I've tried searching around for something describing how the #should method works with the != operator, but couldn't find anything conclusive. Can someone please explain while the following lines will pass if placed into an rspec example?

Re: [rspec-users] should and != operator

Aslak Hellesøy wrote: Den 12. okt. 2009 kl. 21.11 skrev Bret Pettichord : Looks like an rspec bug to me. It's not an rspec bug. != is not a method, and therefore can't be treated by rspec. It's a limitation of ruby. OK. I get it. Bret __

[rspec-users] undefined method `run?' for Test::Unit:Module

in `register_at_exit_hook' from samples/lab6-refactored.rb:4 -- Bret Pettichord GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTO, WatirCraft LLC, http://www.watircraft.com Lead Developer, Watir, http://wtr.rubyforge.org Blog (Essays), http://www.io.com/~wazmo/blog MiniBlog (Links), http://fee

[rspec-users] `add_scenario': wrong, number of arguments (1 for 2)

I am trying to get some old "rbehave" scripts working with cucumber. I am running into an error. I get the same error when I run the "calculator_ruby_features" example. Any suggestions? Bret C:\work\cucumber\examples\calculator_ruby_features>rake features (in C:/work/cucumber/examples/calcula

Re: [rspec-users] `add_scenario': wrong, number of arguments (1 for 2)

Ben Mabey wrote: Are you using the latest cucumber from github? Yes. I did a git pull and reproduced the error right before reporting it. Afterwards, I converted my test to use the new *.feature format and this worked fine. I am curious what the thinking is about supporting the old format.

Re: [rspec-users] `add_scenario': wrong, number of arguments (1 for 2)

Ben Mabey wrote: If that is not the issue please open a ticket on Lighthouse. I tried. lighthouse error ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] `add_scenario': wrong, number of arguments (1 for 2)

aslak hellesoy wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:03 AM, Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ben Mabey wrote: If that is not the issue please open a ticket on Lighthouse. I tried. lighthouse error elaborate? I got a generic lighthouse error. I pa

Re: [rspec-users] `add_scenario': wrong, number of arguments (1 for 2)

aslak hellesoy wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ben Mabey wrote: Are you using the latest cucumber from github? Yes. I did a git pull and reproduced the error right before reporting it. This was fixed three da

[rspec-users] Using Rspec with ScenarioFixtures

I am currently trying to get Rspec to work with ScenarioFixtures. http://code.google.com/p/fixture-scenarios/ http://errtheblog.com/post/7708 I did a quick search and didn't find any mention that any one else had gotten this to work yet. If i missed something, could you please drop me a line. Ot

[rspec-users] Checking out Rspec

I'm getting the following error when i either checkout or update from svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/trunk svn: Error processing command 'mv' in 'C:\work\rspec2\RSpec.tmbundle\Preferences' svn: Can't move source to dest svn: Cannot rename file 'C:\work\rspec2\RSpec.tmbundle\Preferences\.svn\tmp

Re: [rspec-users] Checking out Rspec

On 9/12/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been having connection problems with rspec's rubyforge > repository for a long time. I'm running my own mirror if you want > the subversion link (although the revision numbers are a little bit > off). > > Generally, though, if you are h

Re: [rspec-users] Checking out Rspec

> > Hmm, I just checked out RSpec on Subclipse last week w/no problems. > What platform are you on, which SVN adapter, etc.? I was using Mac OS X > 10.4.10, Eclipse 3.3, Subclipse 1.2.4, SVNKit. I'm using Eclipse 3.3 on windows with Subclipse 1.2.3. I also reproduced the problem using TortoisseS