On Dec 12, 2011, at 10:16 AM, astjohn wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been having issues with my namespaced controllers and specs. I
> receive the following errors only on my create and update actions
> (with invalid parameters) and only on my namespaced controllers. My
> non-namespaced controllers hav
Puts does work. That's not what I'm looking for.
I want all error messages (like `undefined local variable or method `junk'
for...` ) to show up in my rspec out put in *the same way as* `puts`.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
htt
On Dec 22, 2011, at 8:25 AM, LeeQ wrote:
> Puts does work. That's not what I'm looking for.
>
> I want all error messages (like `undefined local variable or method `junk'
> for...` ) to show up in my rspec out put in the same way as `puts`.
> ___
> r
Ah, I see what you are saying. But no, I still want the exception to act
like an exception. My problem is that I'll have a test fail for reasons
unknown, and I then I need to open the test logs to find the exception.
I'd like those exceptions to show up in my test output so I don't have to
d
On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:33 AM, LeeQ wrote:
> Ah, I see what you are saying. But no, I still want the exception to act
> like an exception. My problem is that I'll have a test fail for reasons
> unknown, and I then I need to open the test logs to find the exception. I'd
> like those exception
On Dec 13, 2011, at 9:32 PM, Bill Christian wrote:
> I have a project that collects various application configurations across a
> couple thousand servers and wants to validate settings are following
> recommended values. For example, all weblogic servers should have a minimum
> memory heap siz
On Dec 22, 2011, at 12:33 PM, LeeQ wrote:
> Ah, I see what you are saying. But no, I still want the exception to act
> like an exception. My problem is that I'll have a test fail for reasons
> unknown, and I then I need to open the test logs to find the exception. I'd
> like those exception
