On Nov 24, 2011, at 12:48 AM, Anran Yang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I recently tried to write a custom matcher using rspec dsl, which I'd
like to use as the following:
>
> ==hpgc_spec.rb===
>
> require "spec_helper"
>
> describe Hpgc do
> specify do
> should be_structured
Hi David,
reduce has a number of different forms, one of which is collection.reduce {
> ... } (with a block but no args).
>
My best guess is either your app or another lib/gem is redefining reduce.
> Possible?
>
well I don't know the codebase enough yet, but I guess yes, it's definitely
possib
On Nov 27, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Anran Yang wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2011, at 12:48 AM, Anran Yang wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I recently tried to write a custom matcher using rspec dsl, which I'd like
> > to use as the following:
> >
> > ==hpgc_spec.rb===
> >
> > require "spe
bump!
I sent letter 3 day ago.
No email answer, no new theme in group, no new message here. But new
message in group exists. Why?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/ma
On 30 Aug 2011, at 14:45, Nikolay Sturm wrote:
> * Ash Moran [2011-08-30]:
>> I never thought of that! Yes, that could also work, probably better in
>> fact. It just involves running multiple Guard processes, although
>> there's Terminitor[1] for that!
>
> A single guard process is enough, it wi
