Hi David,
So does that mean that I need to manually delete all other tables for
the rake command to run successfully?
Regards
Chandrika
On Sep 13, 11:32 am, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Chandu80 wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello All,
>
> > I followed steps to install Rspec as in t
Hi,
I am using Rails 3 and rspec-rails gem.
When try to run rspec spec\models\profile.rb
I get result as follows:
'rspec' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
Can you help?
Thanks,
Aashish
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
Thanks Justin,
That isnt working... its erroring with:
The method `delete` was not stubbed or was already unstubbed
--
Rob Aldred
Software Developer
r...@stardotstar.com
twitter: stardotstar
47 Newton Street, Manchester, M1 1FT
T: +44 (0) 161 236 9740
___
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Chandu80 wrote:
> On Sep 13, 11:32 am, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> On Sep 12, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Chandu80 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>
>>> I followed steps to install Rspec as in the link pasted below.
>>
>>> http://www.pmamediagroup.com/2009/04/tutorial-install
On 15 Sep 2011, at 10:05, Rob Aldred wrote:
> Thanks Justin,
> That isnt working... its erroring with:
>
> The method `delete` was not stubbed or was already unstubbed
Hi Rob
For reasons I could go into, when I'm coding myself I don't usually stub out
file system access or other third party
If you've installed the gem via bundler, you'll need to either do
'bundle exec rspec' or run the build via rake (do `rake -T | grep
spec` to list all the spec related tasks). You should also take a look
at http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2011/07/18/stop-typing-bundle-exec/
In any event, most editor
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Rob Aldred wrote:
> Thanks Justin,
> That isnt working... its erroring with:
>
> The method `delete` was not stubbed or was already unstubbed
>
Woops, you're using expectations, not stubs. Try `File.rspec_reset`
>
> --
> Rob Aldred
>
> Software Developer
> r...
Hey Ash,
I like the idea of a wrapper.
In fact I use this method for methods that need to shell out
Maybe your right, the subdirectory would probably a better safer way of
organising the temporary files.
I'll have a re-think.
Thanks for the info.
Rob
--
On Thursday, 15 September 2011 at 1
On 14 September 2011 11:51, Rob Aldred wrote:
> I'm speccing a small lib which manipulates image files using mini_magick.
> The lib creates various temporary files during the process, the lib then
> cleans up the temporary files at the end.
>
> I'm trying to mock expectations that the calls are m
https://github.com/defunkt/fakefs might help too
--
Alex Chaffee - a...@stinky.com
http://alexch.github.com
http://twitter.com/alexch
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
10 matches
Mail list logo
