Sorry if I mentioned this one before, but has anyone proposed being able
to do something like
"it should be able".to {
}
? (or something like that)...
Might be preferable where a test description doesn't start with "it"
Thoughts?
Thanks.
-r
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_
When I try to install rspec-rails it tells me:
ERROR: Error installing rspec-rails:
i18n requires RubyGems version >= 1.3.5
I am using RubyGems 1.3.4, and I am locked down to that version at the
client site. Is there a version of rspec-rails that I can install
without i18n?
=thomas
--
P
On Dec 20, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Roger Pack wrote:
> Sorry if I mentioned this one before, but has anyone proposed being able
> to do something like
>
>
>"it should be able".to {
>
>}
>
> ? (or something like that)...
>
> Might be preferable where a test description doesn't start with "i
On Dec 20, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Thomas Andrews wrote:
> When I try to install rspec-rails it tells me:
>
> ERROR: Error installing rspec-rails:
> i18n requires RubyGems version >= 1.3.5
>
>
> I am using RubyGems 1.3.4, and I am locked down to that version at the
> client site. Is there a ver
David Chelimsky wrote in post #969618:
> On Dec 20, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Thomas Andrews wrote:
>
>> When I try to install rspec-rails it tells me:
>>
>> ERROR: Error installing rspec-rails:
>> i18n requires RubyGems version >= 1.3.5
>>
>>
>> I am using RubyGems 1.3.4, and I am locked down to that
Rob,
This doesn't make sense
1. None of your examples here are using have_selector !
2. Why is OrderMailer no longer creating a receipt
3. Why is @mailer being encoded
Is mailer.body the same in both versions, can you show this.
Have you tried using a debugger before the first have_tag line.
A
