Hey all,
For those of you interested in view isolation in controller specs, an issue has
been reported with ActionController's new respond_with method. Please take a
look at http://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/issues/103 and add comments if you
have any thoughts on the matter.
Thanks,
David
I am trying to use rspec2 rails with rails3 beta 4. I created a simple
project and a couple of models. The basic test spec files are there.
When I run bundle spec:models I get what I expect. When I run bundle
autotest I get:
mauidev:testme dhf$ bundle exec autotest
loading autotest/rails_rspec2
ma
On Jun 27, 2010, at 6:51 PM, Don French wrote:
> I am trying to use rspec2 rails with rails3 beta 4. I created a simple
> project and a couple of models. The basic test spec files are there.
> When I run bundle spec:models I get what I expect. When I run bundle
> autotest I get:
>
> mauidev:testm
Sure did. Just ran it again:
identical .rspec
exist spec
identical spec/spec_helper.rb
exist lib
identical lib/tasks/rspec.rake
identical config/initializers/rspec_generator.rb
exist autotest
identical autotest/discover.rb
I am running everything under b
I always assumed have_tag was part of rspec, but it's not in rspec 2,
and looking now I don't see it in rspec 1 either. Webrat defines it, but
that seems like a coincidence (I tried requiring webrat/core/matchers to
no avail).
Is it depricated, not yet implemented, or does it work for everyone
els
On Jun 27, 2010, at 10:32 PM, Woody Peterson wrote:
> I always assumed have_tag was part of rspec, but it's not in rspec 2,
> and looking now I don't see it in rspec 1 either. Webrat defines it, but
> that seems like a coincidence (I tried requiring webrat/core/matchers to
> no avail).
>
> Is it
