Re: [rspec-users] Testing .Net Newbie

2010-01-15 Thread Joaquin Rivera Padron
hey there there's also http://bddcasts.com with railscasts like bdd screencasts haven't check it much myself, but might deserve a look hth, joaquin 2010/1/14 Ashley Moran > > On Jan 14, 2010, at 1:17 pm, John Polling wrote: > > > I think this is the part that I'm confusing myself with as most

Re: [rspec-users] Testing .Net Newbie

2010-01-15 Thread Diwakar, ANGLER - EIT
Good explanation Phillip. It gives a clear idea... Thanks Regards, Diwakar Others can explain it better than me (and have), but in a nutshell: - use Cucumber for full stack (as the user would see it) testing. Some call it User Acceptance Testing (UAT) - use RSpec for unit/functional testing

Re: [rspec-users] autospec: non-standard filenames & redirecting output

2010-01-15 Thread David Chelimsky
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:10 PM, DeNigris Sean wrote: > Rspec gurus, > > I have 2 questions about autospec. I've played around quite a bit, but > can't figure it out... > > 1. I got autospec to work with my directory structure > ("examples/*_example.rb"), but it only works if I have an empty sp

Re: [rspec-users] default to just call the method?

2010-01-15 Thread Ashley Moran
On 14 Jan 2010, at 17:02, Rick DeNatale wrote: > -1 > > You can already say > > a.should include("1:4") > > which is clearer IMHO. I assume Roger was referring to the general case though (which I still don't like) - and just happened to pick an example with an existing matcher. -- http://