does that shed any light?
2009/8/26 Oliver Barnes :
> sure thing:
>
> http://pastie.org/595363
>
> 2009/8/26 David Chelimsky :
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Oliver
>> Barnes wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm struggling with this controller spec for a few hours now
>>>
>>> http://pastie.org/59477
Sorry, but no. The spec you showed in the original email should work
exactly as you expect. Somehow, for reasons I don't understand,
stub!() appears to be returning a Proc instead of a mock proxy object.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Oliver
Barnes wrote:
> does that shed any light?
>
> 2009/8/2
On 26 Aug 2009, at 19:57, Chuck Remes wrote:
I'm trying to setup some specs (really just assertions) that verify
some callbacks are executed in response to COM events. In the
WIN32OLE_EVENT class you may subscribe to a COM event and have it
delivered to you for processing. Syntax looks lik
i guess it must be something wrong with my setup then? i've been
messing with my gem infrastructure. going to try reinstalling rspec
2009/8/27 David Chelimsky :
> Sorry, but no. The spec you showed in the original email should work
> exactly as you expect. Somehow, for reasons I don't understand,
On Aug 27, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 26 Aug 2009, at 19:57, Chuck Remes wrote:
I'm trying to setup some specs (really just assertions) that verify
some callbacks are executed in response to COM events. In the
WIN32OLE_EVENT class you may subscribe to a COM event and have it
On 27 Aug 2009, at 17:02, Chuck Remes wrote:
On Aug 27, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 26 Aug 2009, at 19:57, Chuck Remes wrote:
I'm trying to setup some specs (really just assertions) that
verify some callbacks are executed in response to COM events. In
the WIN32OLE_EVENT cla
