infoworld article on BDD
http://www.infoworld.com/d/developer-world/behavior-driven-development-catches-605
Good article other than "Behavior" (sans u) and "BDD insists on inside-out."
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyfo
So I notice that Ryan released a new zentest gem today. It looks like
it has been refactored a bit.
Are there any brave guinea pigs/canaries in the RSpec/Cucumber
community who have tried it out? Any issues? I do see that someone
has been reporting some problems with multiruby which is a part of
Hi,
On one project, I have cucumber features and test/unit (well, i guess
activesupport::testcase) tests.
I really like how:
AUTOFEATURE=true autospec
works on my projects that use rspec and cucumber.
Can I get that same behavior, but with my tests in the tests directory?
Joe
__
Hello all,
Is there a way to explicitly tell a mock to expect no messages and give
an error if it does? I believe this is the default behavior, but thought
it might be nice for code readers to see.
Thank you!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
__
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Joe Van Dyk wrote:
>
> I really like how:
> AUTOFEATURE=true autospec
> works on my projects that use rspec and cucumber.
>
> Can I get that same behavior, but with my tests in the tests directory?
Sure. In fact it should work just fine out of the box: do the same
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Sebastian W. wrote:
> Hello all,
> Is there a way to explicitly tell a mock to expect no messages and give
> an error if it does? I believe this is the default behavior, but thought
> it might be nice for code readers to see.
You can tell it to expect not to recei
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Sebastian W. wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> Is there a way to explicitly tell a mock to expect no messages and give
>> an error if it does? I believe this is the default behavior, but thought
>> it might be nice fo
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Sebastian W. wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>> Is there a way to explicitly tell a mock to expect no messages and give
>>> an error if it does? I believe this
autotest doesn't seem to work for me, for some reason:
that file doesn't get loaded when autospec runs.
/home/joe/projects/zoolah/vendor/plugins/mocha/lib/mocha/integration/test_unit.rb:17:in
`remove_method': method `run' not defined in Test::Unit::TestCase
(NameError)
from
/home/joe/pro
David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Sebastian W.
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> Is there a way to explicitly tell a mock to expect no messages and give
>> an error if it does? I believe this is the default behavior, but thought
>> it might be nice for code readers to see.
>
> Yo
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:30 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Sebastian W. wrote:
Hello all,
Is there a way to explicitly tell a mock to expec
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Sebastian W. wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Sebastian W.
>> wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>> Is there a way to explicitly tell a mock to expect no messages and give
>>> an error if it does? I believe this is the default behavior, but t
> So I notice that Ryan released a new zentest gem today. It looks like
> it has been refactored a bit.
>
> Are there any brave guinea pigs/canaries in the RSpec/Cucumber
> community who have tried it out? Any issues? I do see that someone
> has been reporting some problems with multiruby which i
What's the difference between spec:server and autospec?
I understand spec:server is only for a Rails project while autospec
can work with any projects.
I read
http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/spec_server-autospec-nearly-pure-bdd-joy
but couldn't understand it.
I leave autotest/autospec r
Hunt Jon wrote:
What's the difference between spec:server and autospec?
I wouldn't recommend using spec server - use spork instead:
http://github.com/timcharper/spork/tree/master
Both load the rails environment, so that each time you run your tests
(with script/spec -X or script/spec --dr
15 matches
Mail list logo
