On 12 mrt 2009, at 04:22, Stephen Eley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:40 PM, David Schmidt
wrote:
Has anyone else run into this problem and come up with a solution
to getting
a fixed time back from Time.zone.now?
This plugin has worked very well for me:
http://github.com/notahat/time
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Luke Melia wrote:
> Has anyone noticed a slowdown in performance of their cucumber suite from
> 0.1 to 0.2alpha?
>
> I haven't ruled out something in our suite itself, but the slowdown
> appeared to occur concurrently with our upgrade to 0.2alpha.
>
I haven't not
On 14 mrt 2009, at 11:27, Bart Zonneveld wrote:
On 12 mrt 2009, at 04:22, Stephen Eley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:40 PM, David Schmidt mt.com> wrote:
Has anyone else run into this problem and come up with a solution
to getting
a fixed time back from Time.zone.now?
This plugin has
On 13 Mar 2009, at 21:47, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Tim Hart
wrote:
List,
Quick question about Cucumber/Gherkin.
I'm considering adding 'With' as a step definition to support
scenarios like:
Given a policy
With a PCF practice state
And a secondary risk
= flash_messages
- @user = User.find(1)
- if current_user == @user
%new_forum= link_to 'new forum', new_forum_path
- @forum.each do |f|
.group
= link_to f.name, forum_path(f)
- if current_user == @user
= link_to 'edit', edit_forum_path(f)
= link_to 'destroy', forum_path(f),
Den 14. mars. 2009 kl. 13.59 skrev Matt Wynne :
On 13 Mar 2009, at 21:47, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Tim Hart
wrote:
List,
Quick question about Cucumber/Gherkin.
I'm considering adding 'With' as a step definition to support
scenarios like:
Given a po
Am 14.03.2009 um 14:12 schrieb Zhenning Guan:
= flash_messages
- @user = User.find(1)
move that to the controller or a helper. always.
and if you try to find the admin with that, add a flag on the user
so you can write current_user.admin?
> - @forum.each do |f|
> .group
> = link_to f.
On Mar 14, 2009, at 8:49 AM, "Aslak Hellesøy"
wrote:
>
>
> Den 14. mars. 2009 kl. 13.59 skrev Matt Wynne :
>
>>
>> On 13 Mar 2009, at 21:47, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Tim Hart
>>> wrote:
>>> List,
>>>
>>> Quick question about Cucumber/Gherkin.
>>>
>
Hello Scott,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
> http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?LawOfDemeter
>
> Specs are as much of a design tool as a testing tool, and the use of mocks
> in your specs show just how ugly the current design is.
>
> Either write a wrapper around the library which tak
On 13 Mar 2009, at 18:13, Oliver Barnes wrote:
Rails, but any other would be helpful as well, really.
Just a repo of varied real-world cucumber feature examples already
would help a lot, even without the feature steps or an actual
developed app. I've been mining samples from pasties, tutorials
On 14 Mar 2009, at 10:06, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Luke Melia
wrote:
Has anyone noticed a slowdown in performance of their cucumber suite
from 0.1 to 0.2alpha?
Ours is getting slower all the time (as we add more features) so it's
very hard to say. I've noti
Hi all,
I have started a mini-cucumber clone written in Perl.
So for those of you working for enterprises that ruby has no foothold but
perl has fortresses, this might be a nice way to get it through ... it is in
my case anyway.
Other than that I would like to extend a plee for help, and if anyon
Matt Wynne wrote:
On 14 Mar 2009, at 10:06, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Luke Melia wrote:
Has anyone noticed a slowdown in performance of their cucumber suite
from 0.1 to 0.2alpha?
Ours is getting slower all the time (as we add more features) so it's
very hard t
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
> I'm not sure if I like this - dependency between steps seems like a dodgy
> road to go down.
I'm wondering how you'd feel about a style I've adopted:
Scenario: Accepting a direct challenge, without leaving a comment
Given there is a cha
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Mark Wilden wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if I like this - dependency between steps seems like a dodgy
>> road to go down.
>
> I'm wondering how you'd feel about a style I've adopted:
>
> Scenario: Accepting a dire
On Mar 14, 2009, at 6:06 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Luke Melia
wrote:
Has anyone noticed a slowdown in performance of their cucumber suite
from 0.1 to 0.2alpha?
I haven't noticed anything. Do you want to create a benchmark?
I just ran a subset of our sui
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Mark Wilden wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
I'm not sure if I like this - dependency between steps seems like a dodgy
road to go down.
I'm wondering how you'd feel about a style I've adopted:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Joseph Wilk wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Mark Wilden wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>>>
>>>
I'm not sure if I like this - dependency between steps seems like a
dodgy
>
Hey Matt,
Thanks a lot for your elaborated response!
After reading this excellent thread about how to pass state between
steps:
http://www.mail-archive.com/rspec-users@rubyforge.org/msg06296.html
I realized
1. I am not alone in this boat :)
2. that if I write "I go to", "my profile page" ther
Yes, I am writing a Rails app. Anyway, I have got over the initial
"writer's block" thanks to a very insightful thread on this forum
(http://www.mail-archive.com/rspec-users@rubyforge.org/msg06296.html)
and your valuable help. Thank you all!
Balint
Matt Wynne wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2009, at 19:46,
Andrew Premdas wrote:
>
> When /^I follow view (\w+) details link$/ do |object|
> click_link "#{object}_details}"
> end
I think the problem is that you have an extra } in the title of the link
you are looking for. It should just be:
When /^I follow view (\w+) details link$/ do |object|
cli
Doh!, thanks alot :).
2009/3/14 Balint Erdi
> Andrew Premdas wrote:
>
> >
> > When /^I follow view (\w+) details link$/ do |object|
> > click_link "#{object}_details}"
> > end
>
> I think the problem is that you have an extra } in the title of the link
> you are looking for. It should just be:
Is the syntax you're using a misreading of the wiki advice on Feature-Coupled
Steps.
Why not have
"GIven a policy with a PCF practice state and seconday risk"
This is not a featured coupled step because PCF practice state and secondary
risk are part of the Policies state and are not seperate. Se
On 14 Mar 2009, at 19:11, Balint Erdi wrote:
Hey Matt,
Thanks a lot for your elaborated response!
After reading this excellent thread about how to pass state between
steps:
http://www.mail-archive.com/rspec-users@rubyforge.org/msg06296.html
I realized
1. I am not alone in this boat :)
2. t
On 14 Mar 2009, at 15:50, Mark Wilden wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Matt Wynne
wrote:
I'm not sure if I like this - dependency between steps seems like a
dodgy
road to go down.
I'm wondering how you'd feel about a style I've adopted:
Scenario: Accepting a direct challenge,
Hi all
Just wondering if anyone here has seen and/or used LiquidTest[1]? I
notice they have Cucumber integration too.
Has/would anyone pay for this? (It's out of the question for me, as
there's no Mac support.)
Cheers
Ashley
[1] http://www.jadeliquid.com/liquidtest/docs/doku.php?id=lan
I use something similar, however as I need to have my database pre
populated with valid user accounts (the dreaded fixtures) I use
something like..
Given the following users are logged in:
|user|
|first|
|second|
|third|
When the first user sends a message to the second us
On Mar 14, 2009, at 3:38 PM, "Andrew Premdas"
mailto:aprem...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Is the syntax you're using a misreading of the wiki advice on Feature-Coupled
Steps.
Why not have
"GIven a policy with a PCF practice state and seconday risk"
Because the work we are currently doing is going to i
On 14 Mar 2009, at 21:26, Ashley Moran wrote:
Hi all
Just wondering if anyone here has seen and/or used LiquidTest[1]? I
notice they have Cucumber integration too.
Has/would anyone pay for this? (It's out of the question for me, as
there's no Mac support.)
Cheers
Ashley
[1] http://w
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
> We also have a nifty little convention that allows us to talk about 'the
> Widget "Foo"' and 'the Widget "Bar"' because pretty much every entity in our
> domain (or at least the ones we refer to like this in our features) has a
> #name attribut
On 14 Mar 2009, at 21:51, Matt Wynne wrote:
Presumably what you're paying for is all the record / playback
rubbish that allows the unqualified to produce brittle test suites.
Wouldn't touch it with a barge pole myself.
Well that was my initial reaction! Although it does have distributed,
On 14 Mar 2009, at 22:01, Tim Hart wrote:
On Mar 14, 2009, at 3:38 PM, "Andrew Premdas" mailto:aprem...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
Is the syntax you're using a misreading of the wiki advice on
Feature-Coupled Steps.
Why not have
"GIven a policy with a PCF practice state and seconday risk"
Beca
Oh, I see. I'll heed your advice and will consider using @user for the
logged in user in the future.
Thanks again,
Balint
Matt Wynne wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2009, at 19:11, Balint Erdi wrote:
>
>>
>> nice
>>
>> 3. using instance variables to pass state in the course of a features
>> makes step defin
> That sounds like a great way to avoid the instance variable.
Why is a named record preferable to an instance variable? It seems
like the coupling between steps is the same, but the coupled state is
stored differently. Maybe that's the point - stored differently.
I've been tempted to start scena
Thank you for providing the requested information.
On 12 mar, 13:44, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:19 PM,JoséGomes Jr. wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi David, all:
>
> > I recently upgraded to Rails 2.3.1RC2 (Ubuntu 8.10, ruby 1.8.7
> > (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [i486-linux]) and have
On 15 Mar 2009, at 00:30, Josh Chisholm wrote:
That sounds like a great way to avoid the instance variable.
Why is a named record preferable to an instance variable? It seems
like the coupling between steps is the same, but the coupled state is
stored differently. Maybe that's the point - sto
I'm having similar issues, but when I run the CMD + R command in
Textmate:
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/
1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require': no such
file to load -- spec (LoadError) from /System/Library/Frameworks/
Ruby.framework/Vers
Hi All,
I wrote a Cucumber version in Perl 5.
It's very minimal, but maybe someone will find it interesting.
Check it out on http://github.com/kesor/p5-cucumber
-
evgeny
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailm
Hi,
I'm pretty new to Rspec, so hope someone can help me out with this.
I'm leveraging a couple pre-existing applications in my current
project, both have fairly robust test suites in Rspec already.
However, one is using Rspec's builit in mocking, and the other is
using mocha.
If I set config.mo
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Val wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pretty new to Rspec, so hope someone can help me out with this.
>
> I'm leveraging a couple pre-existing applications in my current
> project, both have fairly robust test suites in Rspec already.
> However, one is using Rspec's builit in m
Hey Guys,
I am trying to create a app that makes use of EventMachine.
As I recently fell in love with Rspec, I was trying to use it with our
EM. However, I have no idea how to do this. Also, I want to remove
network connections from the tests (as I might not be connected when
running them), so I t
List,
Quick question about Cucumber/Gherkin.
I'm considering adding 'With' as a step definition to support scenarios like:
Given a policy
With a PCF practice state
And a secondary risk
...
I'm fairly new to ruby - but I can't quite get this one figured out. I've tried
adding
Cucumber.alias_st
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:01 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Val wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm pretty new to Rspec, so hope someone can help me out with this.
>>
>> I'm leveraging a couple pre-existing applications in my current
>> project, both have fairly robust test su
43 matches
Mail list logo
