Hi folks,
In order to bring some order to the many model classes that I have
under /app/models, I'm created a new directory (for example):
/app/models/nestdir
I've added the required configuration line in environment.rb:
config.load_paths += %W( #{RAILS_ROOT}/app/models/nestdir )
But, when I r
On 5 Mar 2009, at 15:24, Ben Mabey wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Matt Wynne
wrote:
Maybe we should make this easier by providing some facility in the
mock framework to express the following in one statement:
@authenticator = stub('authenticator')
Authenticat
Greetings,
Is there a way to check quantity of tags?
Something like this:
response.should have_tag('div').quantity(4)
Thanks.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> FWIW, the OP's code says :on => :create. I also happened to
> seehttp://mawiniarski.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/rspec-validation-on-create/,
> which reinforced for me that this is about validating on create, not
> general validation.
I've figured that out after starting a topic.
_
I checked first and found no conversation that matched my problem so
here it is:
I'm trying to get rspec going on ruby 1.9.1 / rails 2.3.0 - here's my
current gem list:
*** LOCAL GEMS ***
actionmailer (2.3.0)
actionpack (2.3.0)
activerecord (2.3.0)
activeresource (2.3.0)
activesupport (2.3.0)
co
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:40 AM, MAwiniarski wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Is there a way to check quantity of tags?
>
> Something like this:
>
> response.should have_tag('div').quantity(4)
response.should have_tag('div', 4)
Check the assert_select docs (have_tag wraps it) at
http://api.rubyonrails.org
> Yeap everything worked like a charm, once again checking email contents
> like there is no tomorrow ;-)
>
> Rai
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> ___
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailm
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Rick wrote:
> I checked first and found no conversation that matched my problem so
> here it is:
>
> I'm trying to get rspec going on ruby 1.9.1 / rails 2.3.0 - here's my
> current gem list:
rspec-rails does not yet work with Ruby 1.9.1 - this is one item on a
rath
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:02 PM, mudphone wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> In order to bring some order to the many model classes that I have
> under /app/models, I'm created a new directory (for example):
> /app/models/nestdir
>
> I've added the required configuration line in environment.rb:
> config.load_
Hi all,
I'm planning to release rspec-1.2 and rspec-rails-1.2 shortly after
rails-2.3 goes final (rails-2.3.1 was just released as RC2). There are
a couple of loose ends right now, and I need your help in two
important areas. I've curtailed releasing github gems, so please
clone, build and install
Manasi Vora wrote:
>>
>>
>
>
> Hi Rai,
>
> Good that you have found a solution..
>
> but I still don't understand why you want to test sending mails from the
> browser. In my project, we use Cucumber + Webrat for writing functional
> features.
> and Cucumber + selenium for acceptance features
> I'm afraid I can't give a release date. 0.2 is fixed(ish) scope, and
> therefore time can't be fixed at the same time. I have a lot of travel
> the next month, so it will take a least a month I'm afraid.
I know I for one would sure like to see 0.2 come out soon. The scope of
the two 0.2 ticket
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:40 AM, MAwiniarski wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Is there a way to check quantity of tags?
>
> Something like this:
>
> response.should have_tag('div').quantity(4)
Another great resource is
http://labnotes.org/svn/public/ruby/rails_plugins/assert_select/cheat/assert_select.html
Is there a way to locate and 'fill in' a text field (or check a check box,
select an option, etc.) by id? It seems that the fill_in method takes
either the text of the label pointing to the field or the field name. The
are cases when writing cucumber steps when using the HTML id of the input
elem
It does take id. At least in the trunk webrat
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Steve Molitor wrote:
> Is there a way to locate and 'fill in' a text field (or check a check box,
> select an option, etc.) by id? It seems that the fill_in method takes
> either the text of the label pointing to the
Steve Molitor wrote:
> Is there a way to locate and 'fill in' a text field (or check a check
> box,
> select an option, etc.) by id? It seems that the fill_in method takes
> either the text of the label pointing to the field or the field name.
> The
> are cases when writing cucumber steps when u
James Byrne wrote:
S/B
>
> click_button("test_this_id")
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> On 5 Mar 2009, at 15:24, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
>> David Chelimsky wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>>> Maybe we should make this easier by providing some facility in the
>>> mock framework to express the following
Well I'm reading the 0.4.2 webrat rdoc for fill_in, at it says:
"field can be either the value of a name attribute (i.e. user[email]) or the
text inside a element that points at the field."
Does it also try the id?
Steve
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:03 AM, James Byrne wrote:
> Steve Molitor wrot
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:55 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:40 AM, MAwiniarski wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to check quantity of tags?
>
> response.should have_tag('div', 4)
Ooh! Thank you; I wish I'd known that before. All this time I've
been using annoyingly complicated
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Steve Molitor wrote:
> Well I'm reading the 0.4.2 webrat rdoc for fill_in, at it says:
> "field can be either the value of a name attribute (i.e. user[email]) or the
> text inside a element that points at the field."
> Does it also try the id?
Try it! (Or read th
Could you just try it?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Steve Molitor wrote:
> Well I'm reading the 0.4.2 webrat rdoc for fill_in, at it says:
> "field can be either the value of a name attribute (i.e. user[email]) or
> the text inside a element that points at the field."
>
> Does it also try the
I've posted it on this list before, but if you're writing view tests, check
out Elementor:
http://pivotallabs.com/users/patn/blog/articles/608-better-view-testing-with-elementor.
It provides a much cleaner way of asserting on markup, and doesn't require
you to litter your expectations with CSS sele
Hello RSpec group, is there a way to do RSpec-style shared behaviors in
Cucumber? Or something similar?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
You have Background in the new 0.2 version (not released yet) which
lets you specify some Given steps for all the scenarios in a feature.
Other than that there's the super-steps, which also give you really
nice re-use:
http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/14/dry-up-your-cucumber-steps/
On 6 M
Matt Wynne wrote:
You have Background in the new 0.2 version (not released yet) which
lets you specify some Given steps for all the scenarios in a feature.
Other than that there's the super-steps, which also give you really
nice re-use:
http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/14/dry-up-your-cucumbe
On 6 Mar 2009, at 23:35, Ben Mabey wrote:
Matt Wynne wrote:
You have Background in the new 0.2 version (not released yet) which
lets you specify some Given steps for all the scenarios in a feature.
Other than that there's the super-steps, which also give you really
nice re-use:
http://bl
Here's an error message. The details are not important (beyond to_xml on a
virtual AR database via fixture_dependencies). I know how to work the actual
problem.
NoMethodError in 'BlogMindMap should create XML'
undefined method `macro' for nil:NilClass
spec/blog_mind_map_spec.rb:192:
spe
Phlip wrote:
Here's an error message. The details are not important (beyond to_xml
on a virtual AR database via fixture_dependencies). I know how to work
the actual problem.
NoMethodError in 'BlogMindMap should create XML'
undefined method `macro' for nil:NilClass
spec/blog_mind_map_spec
The question is why did RSpec throw away the backtrace? Am I the first
person in history to hit a programming error inside RSpec??
Nope, but this probably isn't one of them.
I said it wrong. The complete venting goes "Am I the first person in history to
use RSpec, and then hit a programming
30 matches
Mail list logo
