On 2009-01-03, at 23:17, Mark Wilden wrote:
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Reza Primardiansyah > wrote:
I found out that running RSpec on Rails takes too much overhead. It
takes more than 16s per run although the specs only take less than
6s, like seen below.
The killer is the time it tak
hello there,
Sometimes I find easier to browse my specs directly on the browser to have
an overall idea of the logic.
To do it I have put up a simple rack app to:
- browse the contents of /spec directory on rails root
- run each spec and view the html formatted output (it does spec FILE -f h)
It
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm getting ready to do a 1.1.12 release of rspec and rspec-rails.
> Given the history of release-related compatibility problems, I offer
> you release candidate gems, which you can acquire thusly:
>
> [sudo] gem install dcheli
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Reza Primardiansyah <
reza.primardians...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
> I found out that running RSpec on Rails takes too much overhead. It takes
> more than 16s per run although the specs only take less than 6s, like seen
> below. That means almost 11s overhead.
Rock on!
Thanks for this this. It's going to make getting rspec ruby 1.9
compliant much easier (since now I'll be able to run rspec's
features!).
Cheers,
David
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:50 PM, aslak hellesoy
wrote:
> Now with Ruby 1.9 support!
>
> Full changelog:
> http://github.com/aslakhe
Now with Ruby 1.9 support!
Full changelog:
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/tree/v0.1.14/History.txt
The gem will be available in an hour or two.
Aslak
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo
Hey all,
I'm getting ready to do a 1.1.12 release of rspec and rspec-rails.
Given the history of release-related compatibility problems, I offer
you release candidate gems, which you can acquire thusly:
[sudo] gem install dchelimsky-rspec -v 1.1.11.5 --source http://gems.github.com
[sudo] gem ins
The step definition is actually:
Then /^should exist exactly "(.*)" users$/ do |cnt|
User.count.should == cnt.to_i
end
but that doesn't change anything, please help!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@r
Hi guys,
I have strange problem with getting model expectations to work with
Cucumber. My setup is that I use Cucumber + Webrat (Selenium backend).
Story I test is registering user on site. Cucumber runs story perfectly
fine, and I see it fills in form, sends it, I even see proper "You have
succe
On 1/4/09 12:13 PM, Hubert Lepicki wrote:
Hi guys,
I have strange problem with getting model expectations to work with
Cucumber. My setup is that I use Cucumber + Webrat (Selenium backend).
My guess is that you are using Selenium in conjuction with rails
transactional fixtures turned on.
Ben Mabey wrote:
> My guess is that you are using Selenium in conjuction with rails
> transactional fixtures turned on. In your env.rb file do you have the
> following?
> Cucumber::Rails.use_transactional_fixtures
That was a perfect guess! Thank you, Ben, a lot!
I have updated Troubleshooting pa
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
>
> Mark, would you mind explicitly telling us/me how you get the ``spec''
> command to run within DRb, please?
>
I use spec rather than script/spec to run specs. script/spec runs my specs
twice. I also use rake spec:server:start rather than sc
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> Mark, would you mind explicitly telling us/me how you get the ``spec''
>> command to run within DRb, please?
>
> I use spec rather than script/spec to run specs. script/spec runs my spec
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> > I use spec rather than script/spec to run specs. script/spec runs my
> specs
> > twice.
>
> That's fixed, so I'm guessing you've got a mixture of old and new
> generated files.
>
I did re-gen with .16, but still got that result.
> The p
On 1/3/09 8:36 PM, Luke Melia wrote:
On Jan 3, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
The downside with this approach is that it only works with the rails
webrat adapter. One solution which I have been meaning to do is to
create a UsersSessionManager. The manager would be responsible for
loggin
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:22 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM, David Chelimsky
> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm getting ready to do a 1.1.12 release of rspec and rspec-rails.
> > Given the history of release-related compatibility problems, I offer
> > you release candi
If not - please do! http://cukes.info
Announcing winner tomorrow. No rallying friends please. Just vote for the
best one.
Aslak
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
17 matches
Mail list logo
