On 5 Dec 2008, at 07:21, Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
WDYT? Possible?
Possibly. :)
That does sound like it might be possible. On the other hand, in
practice, I've found that the current implementation works the way
I'd
Ooh interesting stuff thanks for that Ben, never got past the scenario
tables until now :)
Andrew
2008/12/5 Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Andrew Premdas wrote:
>
>> Given /^I have filled in the form$/ do |details|
>> details.hashes.each |pair|
>>
>> Can't see this working because you've got n
Hello, I'm trying learn Rspec but having problems to understand when and how
user mocks and stubs.
I have a properties_controller with to before_filter actions
(check_administrator_role e load_user)... to access index action of
properties_controller I need have a params[:user] and this parameter wi
Hello, I'm trying learn Rspec but having problems to understand when and how
user mocks and stubs.
I have a properties_controller with to before_filter actions
(check_administrator_role e load_user)... to access index action of
properties_controller I need have a params[:user] and this parameter wi
try:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = User.find(params[:user_id])
User.stub(:find).with(xx).and_return(@user)
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Newman Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> try:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] = User.find(params[:user_id])
> User.stub(:find).with(xx).and_return(@user)
Please quote enough of the email to which you are responding to
provide enough context so that those of us who read ema
Thanks Newman, I already try this but get strange error:
before do
@current_user = mock_model(User, :id => 1)
controller.stub!(:check_administrator_role).and_return(true)
User.stub(:find).with(1).and_return(@user) # <=<=<=<=<=<=
end
The error:
undefined method `stub' for #
Atenci
Daniel Lopes wrote:
Thanks Newman, I already try this but get strange error:
before do
@current_user = mock_model(User, :id => 1)
controller.stub!(:check_administrator_role).and_return(true)
User.stub(:find).with(1).and_return(@user) # <=<=<=<=<=<=
Looks like a missing '!':
User
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Daniel Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Newman, I already try this but get strange error:
> before do
> @current_user = mock_model(User, :id => 1)
> controller.stub!(:check_administrator_role).and_return(true)
> User.stub(:find).with(1).and_ret
Thanks for help and sorry for insistance but I don't understand aspects on
rspec ( I think not understand how we use mocks and stubs):
The behavior of my controller is...
Before Filter:
check_administrator_role
load_user
So, in this case I want run my before filter methods in before block on
rspec
Andrew Premdas wrote:
> James,
...
>
> So back to your original question where does all the detail go? Well
> acceptance tests start from the general and go to the specific, so
> detail comes further down some sort of heirarchy. Thing is you
> haven't got a hierarchy yet so you don't know where t
Pretty hard for me to comment with so much stuff and so little context.
However :)
Your telling an epic story involving work orders, charges (unbilled released
and billed), invoices and transactions. So what are all these things and
what is the business value of them, can we right more focused and
On 2008-12-05, at 01:51, Andrew Premdas wrote:
Scott
Working on this, assuming I have a cloned project 'foo' from my base
project base and I'm working on foo. So I implement something new
and then think this should be in base any ideas how to manage this.
Was thinking maybe of having a bas
On 2008-12-05, at 10:06, Daniel Lopes wrote:
Thanks for help and sorry for insistance but I don't understand
aspects on rspec ( I think not understand how we use mocks and stubs):
Hi Daniel. If you're a bit unsure about when to use mocks vs stubs,
have a read of this article by Martin Fowler
On 2008-12-04, at 19:56, Pat Maddox wrote:
Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 2008-12-04, at 17:43, Nick Hoffman wrote:
The only solution that I can think of is to do this:
before :each do
@account_url = account_url
end
it_should_redirect_to 'the account page', @account_url
Actuall
I hope I'm just missing something obvious here, but I am using fragment
caching in a partial for a view. I test this view with an RSpec view test.
The particular test is using "real" data (i.e. not mocked objects, etc.).
When I run the test, it complains about not knowing of a route for the
frag
Andrew Premdas wrote:
> Pretty hard for me to comment with so much stuff and so little context.
> However :)
My messages are quite long enough as it is I am afraid.
> about a work order to produce invoices. You have to do some design and
> thinking to produce good features. Challenge assumptions
On 5 Dec 2008, at 13:42, Daniel Lopes wrote:
NoMethodError in 'PropertiesController responding to GET index
should expose all properties of given user as @properties'
You have a nil object when you didn't expect it!
The error occurred while evaluating nil.properties
/Users/daniellopes/Trabalh
Thanks Ashley, now the tests passed... but I want understand one thing:
This line is only saying that @properties (assigned[:properties]) have some
value ... is that?
assigns[:properties].should == :user_properties
I can change above to assigns[:properties].should_not be_nill and the
semantic valu
Ashley Moran gave me help in another post that I open by accident when
entries in the group, and now spec passed... But I still would like to
understand more about mocks and stubs that I asked in previous email.
Thanks again and sorry many emails.
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
D
On 5 Dec 2008, at 20:26, Daniel Area Criações wrote:
This line is only saying that @properties (assigned[:properties])
have some value ... is that?
assigns[:properties].should == :user_properties
I can change above to assigns[:properties].should_not be_nill and
the semantic value will be t
Thanks Ashley, you right.
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Visite: http://www.areacriacoes.com.br/projects
http://blog.areacriacoes.com.br/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
55 (31) 3077-4560 /
I am trying to develop code from the feature on down.
So I created a brand new rails app. It has no models yet. I wrote a feature:
Feature: Add tasks
In order to track website improvements
a user
wants to add tasks
Scenario: User adds task
Given task "Display Group Rules" does not ex
I think is better create the step ( it will no work ) and then run
script/generate rspec_scaffold Task name:string description:text
cas_link:string
or if you not using rspec:
script/generate scaffold Task name:string description:text cas_link:string
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criaçõe
Hi!
I'm not sure this is how cucumber should behave.
Should I file one or three tickets at
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber
?
$ cucumber -v
0.1.12
$ mkdir fresh
$ cd fresh
$ cucumber
cucumber.yml was not found. Please define your 'default' and other profiles in
cucumber.
Kero van Gelder wrote:
Hi!
I'm not sure this is how cucumber should behave.
Should I file one or three tickets at
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber
?
Umm... add them separately. I can take at least a couple of them...
-Ben
$ cucumber -v
0.1.12
$ mkdir fresh
$ cd fr
Can you have an And step in a feature? With this, I get a NoMethodError for
'And':
Given /a company named (.+)/ do |name|
@company = Company.create!(:name => name)
end
And /a user named (.+)/ do |name|
@user = create_user name
end
I'm probably missing something really obvious.
///ark
__
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you have an And step in a feature? With this, I get a NoMethodError for
> 'And':
>
> Given /a company named (.+)/ do |name|
> @company = Company.create!(:name => name)
> end
>
> And /a user named (.+)/ do |name|
> @use
Mark Wilden wrote:
> Can you have an And step in a feature? With this, I get a NoMethodError
> for
> 'And':
>
> Given /a company named (.+)/ do |name|
> @company = Company.create!(:name => name)
> end
>
> And /a user named (.+)/ do |name|
> @user = create_user name
> end
>
> I'm probably mi
Kero van Gelder wrote:
Hi!
I'm not sure this is how cucumber should behave.
Should I file one or three tickets at
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber
?
$ cucumber -v
0.1.12
$ mkdir fresh
$ cd fresh
$ cucumber
cucumber.yml was not found. Please define your 'default' and oth
no matter how I try to stub! it still showing this error
I have the following in my spec
Profile.stub!(:new).and_return(@profile = mock_model(Profile))
Then
(rdb:1) @profile.stub!(:user)
#,
@name="Pr
ofile_1300">>,
@args_expectation=#], @match_any_args=true>, @args_to_yield=[],
@method_block
There is a seemingly very useful line of code in the cucumber wiki
that I'd like to use:
After do
# Scenario teardown
Database.truncate_all
end
(from
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/migration-from-rspec-stories)
But when I run this I get an uninitialized constant erro
Thanks a lot Nick...
No, i'm not using Authlogic because already have base project with
restful_authentication implemented with activation, roles and etc... and
when I look authlogic the project was young, I don't know now.
About Martin Fowler post, I already readed... but the problem is because I
On 5 Dec 2008, at 20:31, Daniel Lopes wrote:
Ashley Moran gave me help in another post that I open by accident
when entries in the group, and now spec passed... But I still would
like to understand more about mocks and stubs that I asked in
previous email.
Yes I just noticed I re-answere
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Stephen Veit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to develop code from the feature on down.
>
> So I created a brand new rails app. It has no models yet. I wrote a feature:
>
> Feature: Add tasks
> In order to track website improvements
> a user
> wants to
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:08 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Stephen Veit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am trying to develop code from the feature on down.
>>
>> So I created a brand new rails app. It has no models yet. I wrote a feature:
>>
>> Feat
Thanks for your replies, David and James. I figured as much, actually, since
you wouldn't want to have some And steps in your definition file and some
Given steps.
I was led astray by "Inside a step_definitions.rb file, steps (which
strictly speaking should always be called step definitions) refer
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Song Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Profile.stub!(:new).and_return(@profile = mock_model(Profile))
>
> (rdb:1) @profile.user = 3
> Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError Exception: Mock 'Profile_1300'
> received unexpected message :user= with (3)
>
You're stubbing
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Jeff Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a seemingly very useful line of code in the cucumber wiki
> that I'd like to use:
>
> After do
># Scenario teardown
>Database.truncate_all
> end
>
That's just an example of some code you might call in an A
yes indeed, thanks
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
40 matches
Mail list logo
