Hey list,
I'm currently playing with the selenium acceptance test-thingies, and
I want to build something that saves a screenshot when a test fails.
However, I have no clue whatsoever where to implement this. I'm
thinking it should be along the line of:
- apply a general after_each, in which w
Doesn't Selenium already do that?
Mine takes screenshots on failure.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Bart Zonneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I'm currently playing with the selenium acceptance test-thingies, and
> I want to build something that saves a screenshot when a test fail
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Andrew WC Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Bart Zonneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey list,
> >
> > I'm currently playing with the selenium acceptance test-thingies, and
> > I want to build something that saves a screensh
I'm a complete rSpec newbie, so I might be stepping in somewhere that I
don't belong, but...
Namatra, you said earlier that you were stubbing during setup, and you
shared the before_post method. In the spec, though, you are going a
:get. I'm not familiar with testing controllers yet (just get
Phillip Koebbe wrote:
>
> Namatra,
Sorry, I spelled your name wrong.
Namrata
Peace,
Phillip
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
If you're using mac os x, you could give
http://mosquito.the.tool.googlepages.com a try.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:27 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Andrew WC Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Bart Zonneveld <
I used Selenium with Rpsec less than a month ago.Could you not just roll
back a few version?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Mark Ryall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're using mac os x, you could give
> http://mosquito.the.tool.googlepages.com a try.
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:27 PM, David
On 8-apr-2008, at 14:03, Andrew WC Brown wrote:
> I used Selenium with Rpsec less than a month ago.
> Could you not just roll back a few version?
Nah, I'd rather ditch selenium altogether. It doesn't play that very
nice with Safari, and Firefox needs too much time to start up.
I guess I'll stic
Something is going on in my TextMate bundle--it's calling the wrong lib
for Ruby. I have the environment variables set like this:
>
> TM_RSPEC_HOME /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.3
> TM_RUBY /usr/local/bin/ruby
When I run these queries in a TextMate window I get this:
> which rub
Dear all,
I am wondering how to properly mock/stub out the preliminary steps to
actions protected by restful_authentication and acl_system2 (role-based
authorization to execute actions). Here's my setup:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :roles
has_many :tasks
[snip]
e
Hi all,
My problem is that I've installed both ruby 1.8 (as ruby) and
ruby 1.9 (as ruby1.9) on my system. I use spec/rake/spectask for
my Rakefile. But the generated command is
ruby -I.. blabla
it should be "ruby1.9 -I... blabla", but after look at the code
of spectask.rb, I found this line:
While my approach might not be the best, since I don't
stub :login_required, it still serves me well. I would do something
like this:
user = mock_model(User, :operator => true)
controller.stub!(:current_user).and_return(user)
login_required will find the 'current_user' and be happy. I don't
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Chiyuan Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "ruby" is hard-coded into it. May I request this to be an
> customizable option so that I can set it to "ruby1.9"?
Please file a ticket at http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com
Pat
__
OK, done:
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645-rspec/tickets/370-add-an-option-for-rake-task-to-select-ruby-interpreter
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Chiyuan Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The "ruby" is har
+1 on sheer awesomeness of this presentation! Thanks for sending the slides
out! We are struggling/actively discussing our use of plain text stories,
and this really adds a lot to our conversation.
thanks.
-Corey
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:31 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu,
Everything seemed so fine, but when i tried to
investigate a little i discovered this tremendous
behaviour of the spec:
--- CommentsController
def create
@comment = Comment.new(params[:comment])
@user = User.find(params[:user_id])
@comment.author = 'foobar'
Hi Glenn, thanks for the response.
> I would do something like this:
>
> user = mock_model(User, :operator => true)
> controller.stub!(:current_user).and_return(user)
OK, so, :operator is not a User attribute. Rather, a user is an
operator, so to speak, if a habtm relationship exists between the
On 8.4.2008, at 23.17, Giuseppe Bertini wrote:
Hi Glenn, thanks for the response.
I would do something like this:
user = mock_model(User, :operator => true)
controller.stub!(:current_user).and_return(user)
OK, so, :operator is not a User attribute. Rather, a user is an
operator, so to spea
On 8.4.2008, at 23.06, roberto belardo wrote:
Everything seemed so fine, but when i tried to
investigate a little i discovered this tremendous
behaviour of the spec:
--- CommentsController
def create
@comment = Comment.new(params[:comment])
@user = User.find(param
Hi Jarkko, I see your point.
However, checking the user's roles in order to authorize access to the
action is done behind the scenes by the acl_system2 plugin, which would
not know what to do with has_role?, unless I am missing something.
Thanks!
Giuseppe
> You might want to take that one step
Yea a fix would be amazing. This is knda annoying because now I have to
press ctrl-c or something to run that spec.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Willem Källman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Same problem here, but I guess it has nothing to do with RSpec or the
> fact that you are testing a mode
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Giuseppe Bertini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am wondering how to properly mock/stub out the preliminary steps to
> actions protected by restful_authentication and acl_system2 (role-based
> authorization to execute actions). Here's my setup:
>
I us
David, Aslak,
Any word on the most eagerly anticipated book ever?
/g
--
George Anderson
BenevolentCode LLC
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:16 PM, George Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David, Aslak,
>
> Any word on the most eagerly anticipated book ever?
Close to beta where:
two.weeks < close < three.months
I know it's a wide range, but everyone involved is quite busy. Getting
closer though.
Cheers
Thx. Remember, when you think "Beta Book," set your expectations low.
We're motivated consumers; we'll buy an "Alpha Book."
Sorry to distract you from writing.
/g
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:16 PM, George Anderson
> <
+1 just ship it ;-)
On 9/04/2008, at 2:31 PM, George Anderson wrote:
> Thx. Remember, when you think "Beta Book," set your expectations low.
> We're motivated consumers; we'll buy an "Alpha Book."
>
> Sorry to distract you from writing.
>
> /g
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, David Chel
hello:
I just installed rspec 1.1.3 by doing this:
gem install rspec
and then in the root of my project, I did this:
ruby script/plugin install
svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/CURRENT/rspec_on_rails
And now, when I run a unit test (that worked before the rspec
installation), I'm getting th
Hi I'm trying to be good and practice full BDD on my current project,
and don't want to abandon it as I have previously (expediency triumphed
unfortunately). So expect me to be making frequent 'noob' style posts...
My current issue is with testing assignation across a has_many
relationship. I'm aw
Hello all,
What is the best way to verify that a method yields a block that is
passed in?
Before I added any 'yield' to my method I created this spec:
it "should yield a message_delivery object" do
create_message_in_factory do |message_delivery|
message_delivery.should be
29 matches
Mail list logo
