[rspec-users] attachment_fu with fixtures

Dear list, I can't figure out how to use fixtures with attachment_fu. I know how to use files with RSpec in my controllers, BackgroundPhoto.create(:uploaded_data => fixture_file_upload("files/ some.zip", "application/x-zip")), but this does not work with fixtures(obviously). More important

Re: [rspec-users] OT local version control?

although i primarily use mercurial, bazaar (http://bazaar-vcs.org/) is also worth a mention On Jan 27, 2008 4:42 PM, Chad Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A good thing to note is that you can run many of the distributed scm tools > in a 'svn wrapper' mode to ease transition with existing rep

Re: [rspec-users] OT local version control?

We recently started using git on our project. It still uses a svn repository and we enjoy the use of the git-svn bridge to synchronize things. There are a few things we haven't figured out how to do yet with git-svn: * create tags or branches * commit to tags or branches * see the filenames of fil

Re: [rspec-users] OT local version control?

Yes, bazaar deserves extra props because it's the scm powering a lot of the Ubuntu integration projects. It's open source (I think they pretty much all are) but its development is sponsored by Canonical, which is the company behind Ubuntu. I can't remember why I ditched bazaar - I think it was bec

Re: [rspec-users] Could this controller test be made simpler?

Been a month since I've rspec, I think you can place the stubs here. @user = mock_model(User, login => "", email => "", password => "", password_confirmation => "" ) @account = mock_model(Account, subdomain => "", company_name => "", filename => "" ) On Jan 28, 2008 2:36 PM, Chris Olsen <[EMAIL

[rspec-users] client first, top down, outside in, etc with rails

I'm starting a new project and I want to try writing the client first. I.e. I want to write my 'views' first and I would like to mock out all the models in such a way that I can run the site and browse it with the mocked out models. Is it easy to use rspec's mocking for this sort of thing and ha

Re: [rspec-users] client first, top down, outside in, etc with rails

awesome Nathan Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] rspec 1.1 rspec_on_rails 1.1 rails 2.0.2 On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Jay Donnell wrote: > I apologize, I oversimplified for the sake of brevity. We have most > of the models written but there are some pieces than aren't and > won't be written in the n

[rspec-users] Could this controller test be made simpler?

In a create controller method I am testing the else clause that occurs when the model is unable to be saved. Sounds simple enough, but because model is created before the save and the form has to be re-filled I now have to stub a model and all the attributes. Since the error messages are displaye

Re: [rspec-users] client first, top down, outside in, etc with rails

I apologize, I oversimplified for the sake of brevity. We have most of the models written but there are some pieces than aren't and won't be written in the near future. I wanted to mock them out in some form so we can implement those portions of the views. Things like certain features of the sid

Re: [rspec-users] client first, top down, outside in, etc with rails

On Jan 28, 2008 12:01 PM, Jay Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm starting a new project and I want to try writing the client first. I.e. I > want to write my 'views' first and I would like to mock out all the models in > such a way that I can run the site and browse it with the mocked out m

Re: [rspec-users] Could this controller test be made simpler?

Good point. I guess it was the account.user, account.users.build and all the validation methods that I thought may be unnecessary. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/ma

Re: [rspec-users] client first, top down, outside in, etc with rails

sorry about that, I have no idea how that happened. It looked fine in yahoo mail before I sent it :/ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.y

Re: [rspec-users] Textmate RSpec Bundle 'it' snippet

Along these lines, I also think that a empty spec should be failing or at least pending. On Jan 27, 2008, at 6:50 AM, Matt Darby wrote: > Ah, I was unaware of this. Thanks for the pointer. > > On Jan 27, 2008, at 2:42 AM, Francois Wurmus wrote: > >> Hi Matt, >> >> one way of doing this is to l

Re: [rspec-users] Textmate RSpec Bundle 'it' snippet

On Jan 28, 2008 5:42 PM, James Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Along these lines, I also think that a empty spec should be failing or > at least pending. +1 ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [rspec-users] client first, top down, outside in, etc with rails

On Jan 28, 2008 3:24 PM, Jay Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess I can use dummy methods in my models that simply return some canned > result. Maybe even name it 'my_method_dummy' so I can easily track down the > dummy methods. The stubbing syntax is so clean In rspec that I was hoping I