On Jan 14, 2008 3:47 AM, Kero van Gelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have a spec that is hanging when it is running.
> > >
> > > How do I get the rspec runner to show what specs it's running so I can
> > > which one is hanging? I am calling the runner from my rails project.
> >
> > Which fo
Yes. The fix is coming soon. I'll try to get it out tonight.
On Jan 13, 2008 3:49 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2008 5:47 PM, Matthew Windwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seems like the recently updated (and wonderful) textmate bundle does not
> > take into accoun
On Jan 14, 2008 9:23 AM, Brian Takita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. The fix is coming soon. I'll try to get it out tonight.
Actually, we are going to do a release. I'll do it after the release.
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2008 3:49 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 13, 2008 5:4
Check out the UserStories video on PeepCode.
Cost = $9US - a bargain with your strong currency.
Cheers, Andy
>I have played a bit with RSpec specs and now want to check out stories. I
>note that there is no generator for rspec stories pre se (unless I managed
>to miss all references to one ) and
I have played a bit with RSpec specs and now want to check out stories. I
note that there is no generator for rspec stories pre se (unless I managed
to miss all references to one ) and that the only directory relating to
stories added by installing rspec is ./stories itself.
The documentation at
> The benefit of doing that is it spots files that you may not have
> spec'd that you want spec'd. On the flip side you end up with a bunch
> of noise but you can eliminate that w/ the :initialize hook:
>
> Autotest.add_hook :initialize do |at|
> at.add_exception 'some_file_i_want_ignored'
> end
On Jan 14, 2008 6:46 PM, Kero van Gelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The benefit of doing that is it spots files that you may not have
> > spec'd that you want spec'd. On the flip side you end up with a bunch
> > of noise but you can eliminate that w/ the :initialize hook:
> >
> > Autotest.add_h
On 1/14/08, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I would love if someone could help me figure this out. I can't seem to see
> why the following fails:
>
> Here's the spec:
> it "should redirect back to the index page" do
> Coupon.should_receive
> (:new).with({"name"=>@expect
That was it! Thanks, Rick!
Sorry about not posting the failure. DOH! Thanks again, everyone!
-Corey
On Jan 14, 2008 9:38 PM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/14/08, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, all!
> >
> > I would love if someone could help me figure this out.
Did your spec failed?
Would you paste it?
On Jan 14, 2008 9:32 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008 8:31 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, all!
> >
> > I would love if someone could help me figure this out. I can't seem to
> see
> > why the following
On Jan 14, 2008 8:31 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I would love if someone could help me figure this out. I can't seem to see
> why the following fails:
>
> Here's the spec:
> it "should redirect back to the index page" do
> Coupon.should_receive
> (:new).with({"n
Hi, all!
I would love if someone could help me figure this out. I can't seem to see
why the following fails:
Here's the spec:
it "should redirect back to the index page" do
Coupon.should_receive
(:new).with({"name"=>@expectedName,"amount"=>@expectedAmount}).and_return(@coupon)
@coupon.s
12 matches
Mail list logo
