perfect :)
martin
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Joaquin Rivera Padron
wrote:
> maybe then check http://github.com/cavalle/steak
>
> joaquin
>
> 2010/4/29 Martin DeMello
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>> >
>> > Should be fine, though you might find cucumber/aruba a
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Matthew Van Horn
wrote:
> I've been using rspec with webrat, for exactly this sort of thing, as
> detailed here:
> http://blog.veez.us/2009/09/11/integration-testing-without-cucumber
Thanks!
martin
___
rspec-users mail
maybe then check http://github.com/cavalle/steak
joaquin
2010/4/29 Martin DeMello
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
> >
> > Should be fine, though you might find cucumber/aruba a nice combination
> for
> > this too.
>
> Cucumber seems to make things a lot more verbose :( Ver
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> Should be fine, though you might find cucumber/aruba a nice combination for
> this too.
Cucumber seems to make things a lot more verbose :( Very ingenious
idea, but in practice I prefer specifying stuff in ruby to specifying
it in English.
m
I've been using rspec with webrat, for exactly this sort of thing, as
detailed here: http://blog.veez.us/2009/09/11/integration-testing-without-cucumber
On Apr 27, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
I have a series of tests I want to automate, which involve running
shell scripts in a "l
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> Should be fine, though you might find cucumber/aruba a nice combination for
> this too.
Thanks, aruba looks really interesting! Will explore it.
martin
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@ruby
On 27 Apr 2010, at 10:36, Martin DeMello wrote:
I have a series of tests I want to automate, which involve running
shell scripts in a "live" environment (i.e. nothing mocked or
stubbed), and then verifying the state of the system. I thought that,
even though it doesn't fit the classic definitio
