Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-11 Thread aslak hellesoy
> Hi All > > > > It seems to me that there's an opportunity for packaging together and > > sharing steps, but am curious of folks thoughts on the best way to go > about > > this. > > > > Mike > > > > Customer/Users are likely to have their 'own' language' and that > providing library steps - could

Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-11 Thread aidy lewis
Hi All > It seems to me that there's an opportunity for packaging together and > sharing steps, but am curious of folks thoughts on the best way to go about > this. > > Mike > Customer/Users are likely to have their 'own' language' and that providing library steps - could thus be argued - to neg

Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-09 Thread aslak hellesoy
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, aslak hellesoy > wrote: > >> [ Matt Wynne: ] > >> So are you saying we'd put the steps in a gem, then include them using > require? > > > > Yes. > > Is there any reason not to accept them for inclusion in the Cucumber > gem? Yes. It becomes too big for me to ma

Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Eley
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote: >> [ Matt Wynne: ] >> So are you saying we'd put the steps in a gem, then include them using >> require? > > Yes. Is there any reason not to accept them for inclusion in the Cucumber gem? You already have precedent with the Webrat steps. O

Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-09 Thread Matt Wynne
On 8 May 2009, at 15:24, aslak hellesoy wrote: So are you saying we'd put the steps in a gem, then include them using require? So I can do this in my env file: gem 'cucumber-steps' require 'cucumber/steps/webrat' require 'cucumber/steps/factory_girl' or in another pro

Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-08 Thread aslak hellesoy
> > On 8 May 2009, at 09:12, aslak hellesoy wrote: > > >> >> On 8 May 2009, at 05:55, Mike Doel wrote: >> >> Cucumber is awesome and destined to rule the world. As that starts to >> happen, has there been any thought of a mechanism for the community to build >> a library of common, generally usefu

Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-08 Thread Matt Wynne
On 8 May 2009, at 09:12, aslak hellesoy wrote: On 8 May 2009, at 05:55, Mike Doel wrote: Cucumber is awesome and destined to rule the world. As that starts to happen, has there been any thought of a mechanism for the community to build a library of common, generally useful steps that

Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-08 Thread Mike Doel
Ok. That sounds like a good plan. I'll update it to a gem and submit the wiki change when I get home from vegas. Mike Doel m...@mikedoel.com On May 8, 2009, at 1:12 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote: On 8 May 2009, at 05:55, Mike Doel wrote: Cucumber is awesome and destined to rule the world.

Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-08 Thread aslak hellesoy
> > On 8 May 2009, at 05:55, Mike Doel wrote: > > Cucumber is awesome and destined to rule the world. As that starts to >> happen, has there been any thought of a mechanism for the community to build >> a library of common, generally useful steps that can be used across >> projects? I've got stu

Re: [rspec-users] Sharing common Cuke steps

2009-05-08 Thread Matt Wynne
On 8 May 2009, at 05:55, Mike Doel wrote: Cucumber is awesome and destined to rule the world. As that starts to happen, has there been any thought of a mechanism for the community to build a library of common, generally useful steps that can be used across projects? I've got stuff that I