James Byrne wrote:
>
> I have one other difficulty when running this on MS-WinXPpro under
> cygwin. The newline character seems to have no effect. I can force it
> to behave locally by adding a \r in front of each \n but, obviously,
> that will have unfortunate consequences on *nix.
Actually
James Byrne wrote:
>
> What is happening is that RSpec is blowing up at its own logger code in
> the default spec_helper.rb file. This happens whether or not ActAsFu is
> installed and whether or not my custom logger is commented out in
> environment.rb
I poked at this a bit and hit upon the
Glad it works. Just so you know, you can get created_at and updated_at
by calling #timestamps:
require 'rubygems'
require 'acts_as_fu'
require 'spec'
describe "timestamps" do
before(:each) do
build_model(:people) { timestamps }
@person = Person.create!
James Byrne wrote:
> Pat Nakajima wrote:
>> James,
>>
>> Can you show me how you're trying to use ActsAsFu?
>>
>> Pat
>
> Not easily, because I removed the code. When I get a moment I will
> reset it and post here. It will be later today.
Here is what I have. FYI once I removed the custom l
Pat Nakajima wrote:
> James,
>
> Can you show me how you're trying to use ActsAsFu?
>
> Pat
Not easily, because I removed the code. When I get a moment I will
reset it and post here. It will be later today.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
Pat Nakajima wrote:
> After taking another look, I think you may be able to do something
> like this to test your logger:
> https://gist.github.com/3c55cbec990f283c5399
I am not trying to test my custom logger. That part has worked for a
few weeks now.
What is happening is that RSpec is blowin
After taking another look, I think you may be able to do something
like this to test your logger: https://gist.github.com/3c55cbec990f283c5399
Let me know if that works.
Pat
On Jan 30, 11:10 am, James Byrne wrote:
> Pat Nakajima wrote:
> > If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions
James,
Can you show me how you're trying to use ActsAsFu?
Pat
On Jan 30, 11:52 am, James Byrne wrote:
> Pat Nakajima wrote:
> > If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
> > acts_as_fu:http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
> > ActiveRecord models de
Pat Nakajima wrote:
> If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
> acts_as_fu: http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
> ActiveRecord models dead simple.
Perhaps I misunderstood what this gem is supposed to provide but when I
call create! on an object p
So, in acts_as_fu, I actually set the ActiveRecord logger to just log
to a StringIO that you can inspect by calling ActsAsFu.log. That's not
going to fly for your project though, so let me give the ability to
set your own. It'll be committed soon.
- Pat
On Jan 30, 11:10 am, James Byrne wrote:
>
James Byrne wrote:
>
> and when I run rake spec I see this:
>
> NameError in 'Role should create a new instance given valid attributes'
> undefined local variable or method `logger' for
> #
> /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.2.2/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in
>
> `meth
Pat Nakajima wrote:
> If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
> acts_as_fu: http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
> ActiveRecord models dead simple.
>
This seems to work very well. However, I am causing myself a problem
with the logger and I coul
Pat Nakajima wrote:
> (Sorry if this is double-posted, I was having trouble with joining the
> list)
>
> If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
> acts_as_fu: http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
> ActiveRecord models dead simple.
>
> Pat
This see
Pat Nakajima wrote:
(Sorry if this is double-posted, I was having trouble with joining the
list)
If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
acts_as_fu: http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
ActiveRecord models dead simple.
Pat
Very slick. I'll
(Sorry if this is double-posted, I was having trouble with joining the
list)
If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
acts_as_fu: http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
ActiveRecord models dead simple.
Pat
On Jan 29, 10:18 pm, Ben Mabey wrote:
> Jam
James Byrne wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
You can then use the dummy AR classes in your specs with an in-memory
DB.
I hope that helps,
Ben
Oh, yes. very much. Especially this example.
def setup_db
ActiveRecord::Schema.define(:version => 1) do
Have you, or anyone reading thi
Ben Mabey wrote:
>
> You can then use the dummy AR classes in your specs with an in-memory
> DB.
>
> I hope that helps,
>
> Ben
Oh, yes. very much. Especially this example.
> def setup_db
> ActiveRecord::Schema.define(:version => 1) do
Have you, or anyone reading this, had any experience
James B. Byrne wrote:
I wish to test a small library that I have written. The module
resides in a file in ./lib. It is loaded in the application via a a
file in ./config/initializers that contains the following code:
require 'hll_audit_stamps'
ActiveRecord::Base
include ActiveRecord::HLLA
18 matches
Mail list logo
