Unfortunately, it doesn't solve the problem. Thanks anyway
Yi
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> > The following statement gave me "wrong number of arguments (2 for 1)" and
> it
> > is the only error. no stack trace.
> >
I haven't looked into it too much. But I believe it is because I implemented
method_missing and respond_to?, which probably conflicts with RSpec's
imlementations. I have been wanting to re-implement my functionality in
another way other than method_missing for a long time. It seems now is the
perfe
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> The following statement gave me "wrong number of arguments (2 for 1)" and it
> is the only error. no stack trace.
> presenter.stub!(:account).and_return account
> any idea? Thanks
> Yi
>
> ___
> rs
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> The following statement gave me "wrong number of arguments (2 for 1)" and it
> is the only error. no stack trace.
try running with --backtrace
> presenter.stub!(:account).and_return account
> any idea? Thanks
> Yi
>
> _
The following statement gave me "wrong number of arguments (2 for 1)" and it
is the only error. no stack trace.
presenter.stub!(:account).and_return account
any idea? Thanks
Yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyfo
