Re: [rspec-users] silly partial qu

2008-05-04 Thread steven shingler
Hi Rick - Thanks again. Cool - I see what you mean about what the story steps should get involved with, and what should be left to the specs. In that case, my response.should have_tag('li', @title) is a reasonable test, and I'll leave it at that! All the best, Steven On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:36 PM

Re: [rspec-users] silly partial qu

2008-05-04 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:16 AM, steven shingler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Rick, > Thanks for your reply. > You are right that this step is basically testing the basic actions of > a controller, and is being run as part of a story_with_steps stack. > The step itself is definitely being hi

Re: [rspec-users] silly partial qu

2008-05-04 Thread steven shingler
Hi Rick, Thanks for your reply. You are right that this step is basically testing the basic actions of a controller, and is being run as part of a story_with_steps stack. The step itself is definitely being hit, because I have a: response.should have_tag('li', @title) ...in the same step, and that

Re: [rspec-users] silly partial qu

2008-05-03 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:08 PM, steven shingler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all, > > i'm just trying to check a partial has been rendered, by using: > response.template.should_receive(:render).with(:partial => "tasks/list") > > this passes, even if I put something bogus in the partial name,

[rspec-users] silly partial qu

2008-05-03 Thread steven shingler
hi all, i'm just trying to check a partial has been rendered, by using: response.template.should_receive(:render).with(:partial => "tasks/list") this passes, even if I put something bogus in the partial name, such as: response.template.should_receive(:render).with(:partial => "___tassdfsdfks/list