Re: [rspec-users] rspec vs. test::more

2008-03-04 Thread Pat Maddox
On 3/4/08, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like this line: > > "That sounds like something I should pay you a lot of money for! Sign me > up!" > > David, I didn't realize that I was racking up a huge monetary debt to you. > > -Corey You'll pay up if you value your kneecaps. Pat __

Re: [rspec-users] rspec vs. test::more

2008-03-04 Thread Corey Haines
I like this line: "That sounds like something I should pay you a lot of money for! Sign me up!" David, I didn't realize that I was racking up a huge monetary debt to you. -Corey On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Korny Sietsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow - both funny and a little tragic. >

Re: [rspec-users] rspec vs. test::more

2008-03-04 Thread Korny Sietsma
Wow - both funny and a little tragic. He really doesn't understand what "readable" means, does he? "you keep using that word - I do not think it means what you think it means" - Korny On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Matthias Hennemeyer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > you HAVE to read t

[rspec-users] rspec vs. test::more

2008-03-04 Thread Matthias Hennemeyer
Hey all, you HAVE to read this blog post: http://blog.jrock.us/articles/RSpec%20vs.%20Test::More.pod#comments My favorite parts are: 1) ... some rspec code ... > For the sake of comparison lets translate this directly into perl: ... some perl code ... 2) >First, notice that the rspec-version i