El 18/4/2008, a las 14:16, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> On Apr 18, 2008, at 3:43 AM, Dan North wrote:
>
>> With mercurial I nearly did a similar thing, working on my own but
>> committing from two different machines. Luckily mercurial gave me a
>> warning that allowed me to mak
On Apr 18, 2008, at 3:43 AM, Dan North wrote:
With mercurial I nearly did a similar thing, working on my own but
committing from two different machines. Luckily mercurial gave me a
warning that allowed me to make sense of what I was doing. Not sure
how this works with git but here goes.
1
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Dan North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could a pull-merge-commit before pushing have avoided this, and should we
> make that our endorsed way of working? Or am I missing something else about
> how dscm works?
I'm still fuzzy on the details of exactly what happened
With mercurial I nearly did a similar thing, working on my own but
committing from two different machines. Luckily mercurial gave me a warning
that allowed me to make sense of what I was doing. Not sure how this works
with git but here goes.
1. I push from laptop1 to my central server. All is good
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Jonathan Leighton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 08:49 -0400, David Chelimsky wrote:
> > This all make sense?
>
> Ok, I have to confess I haven't been paying that much attention to the
> way things are or were set out on github, so let me see
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 08:49 -0400, David Chelimsky wrote:
> This all make sense?
Ok, I have to confess I haven't been paying that much attention to the
way things are or were set out on github, so let me see if I'm fully
understanding what you're saying...
Was "rspec" previously split up into sev
Great information, David.
Sounds like a useful blog post!
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:49 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:11 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > On Apr 17, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Jonathan Leighton
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >>
On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:11 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Jonathan Leighton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Is there any chance you could elaborate on the problems please, so
>> that
>> other projects can make an informed decision whether to use
>>
On Apr 17, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Jonathan Leighton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Is there any chance you could elaborate on the problems please, so
> that
> other projects can make an informed decision whether to use submodules
> or not?
There is always a chance :)
I'll be at a comp
Hi David,
Is there any chance you could elaborate on the problems please, so that
other projects can make an informed decision whether to use submodules
or not?
Cheers,
Jon
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 22:39 -0400, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> We ran into some problems last night with the rep
Hey all,
We ran into some problems last night with the repos up at github. We
initially thought it was a git-submodules bug. We learned that it was
something else, but in the process of trying to find the source of the
bug, we learned a few things about git-submodules and have decided
that it crea
11 matches
Mail list logo
