Re: [rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Jan 11, 2008 11:33 AM, Kerry Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This isn't specific to RSpec, but is hopefully on-topic for this list. > > I like (especially when "ping pong pairing") to write a spec, then > write the smallest amount of code I can to pass it (especially when > "ping pong pairi

Re: [rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jan 11, 2008 10:19 AM, Jonathan Linowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:50 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > Apparently, Pat and I are twins separated at birth. > > Would it then be correct to refactor and eliminate one of them?? If you could argue that we were ultimately co

Re: [rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread Nathan Sutton
We're clearly at green! Nathan Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] rspec 1.1 rspec_on_rails 1.1 rails 2.0.2 On Jan 11, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:50 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > >> Apparently, Pat and I are twins separated at birth. > > > Would it then be correct t

Re: [rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread Jonathan Linowes
On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:50 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > Apparently, Pat and I are twins separated at birth. Would it then be correct to refactor and eliminate one of them?? :)) ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org

Re: [rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread Kerry Buckley
On 11 Jan 2008, at 10:50, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Jan 11, 2008 4:48 AM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > Apparently, Pat and I are twins separated at birth. Thanks both! Kerry ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org h

Re: [rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread Pat Maddox
On Jan 11, 2008 2:50 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2008 4:48 AM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 11, 2008 2:33 AM, Kerry Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This isn't specific to RSpec, but is hopefully on-topic for this list. > > > > > > I

Re: [rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jan 11, 2008 4:48 AM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2008 2:33 AM, Kerry Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This isn't specific to RSpec, but is hopefully on-topic for this list. > > > > I like (especially when "ping pong pairing") to write a spec, then > > write the sm

Re: [rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jan 11, 2008 4:33 AM, Kerry Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This isn't specific to RSpec, but is hopefully on-topic for this list. > > I like (especially when "ping pong pairing") to write a spec, then > write the smallest amount of code I can to pass it (especially when > "ping pong pairin

Re: [rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread Pat Maddox
On Jan 11, 2008 2:33 AM, Kerry Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This isn't specific to RSpec, but is hopefully on-topic for this list. > > I like (especially when "ping pong pairing") to write a spec, then > write the smallest amount of code I can to pass it (especially when > "ping pong pairin

[rspec-users] Varying test data

2008-01-11 Thread Kerry Buckley
This isn't specific to RSpec, but is hopefully on-topic for this list. I like (especially when "ping pong pairing") to write a spec, then write the smallest amount of code I can to pass it (especially when "ping pong pairing"). Sometimes this means hard-coding a return value, which means ano