On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Lenny Marks wrote:
>
> One place I've actually been interested in testing URLs was to verify that
> the app actually redirected after a form submission.
I can agree with this, and I had a similar need just the other day. I
had an action that redirected to differ
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> I would just test that at the controller level
I would _specify_ that at the controller level.
BAD BDD evangelist :P
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailma
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Lenny Marks wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
>> Gavin Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> "Then I should be on /users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit"
>>>
>>> What's the solution for parsing out and matching and arbitrarily deep
>>> nested route?
>>>
>> Hi G
On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Ben Mabey wrote:
Gavin Hughes wrote:
"Then I should be on /users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit"
What's the solution for parsing out and matching and arbitrarily deep
nested route?
Hi Gavin,
Let me try to answer your question without actually answering it. :)
I gen
Gavin Hughes wrote:
"Then I should be on /users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit"
What's the solution for parsing out and matching and arbitrarily deep
nested route?
Hi Gavin,
Let me try to answer your question without actually answering it. :)
I generally don't test my URLs. IMO, for the majorit
Ben, Josh
Makes perfect sense. The user won't be looking at the URL. He'll
expect some result on the page, thus we test for that.
Thanks!
Gavin
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://
I'm not sure, cause I've never tried to write a step like that.
I would rather do
Then I should see "Editing 'My sweet comment'"
Even better would be to actually edit the comment and make sure that
it changed. So maybe
When I edit the comment to be "My new comment"
Then I should see "My new com
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Gavin Hughes wrote:
> The problem is actually this:
>
> And I fill in ...
> And I press "Create Comment"
> Then I should be on [the correct page, ie.
> /users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit]
>
> How do you write a step for that?
Personally I try and stay away from step
Gavin Hughes wrote:
The problem is actually this:
And I fill in ...
And I press "Create Comment"
Then I should be on [the correct page, ie.
/users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit]
How do you write a step for that?
I just saw this second message.. My assumption about what you were
testing was of
The problem is actually this:
And I fill in ...
And I press "Create Comment"
Then I should be on [the correct page, ie.
/users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit]
How do you write a step for that?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users maili
"Then I should be on /users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit"
What's the solution for parsing out and matching and arbitrarily deep
nested route?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.
11 matches
Mail list logo
