Re: [rspec-users] RSpec wire protocol Was:Re: describe "RSpec's documentation" do

2009-12-11 Thread Ed Howland
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Matt Wynne wrote: > Yes we did, briefly - probably before the discussion went online on the > lighthouse ticket. I think there were a couple of reasons why not REST: > (1) simplicity - we wanted the wire server to be as low-tech as possible so > it would be easy an

Re: [rspec-users] RSpec wire protocol Was:Re: describe "RSpec's documentation" do

2009-12-11 Thread Matt Wynne
On 9 Dec 2009, at 00:09, Ed Howland wrote: Matt, I was facinated to read the email thread on Cuke's wire protoccol. You guys collaborated well. I have been working on my own to develop a similar protocol for RSpec. It is totally external to RSpec right now and very primitive. Whereas w

[rspec-users] RSpec wire protocol Was:Re: describe "RSpec's documentation" do

2009-12-08 Thread Ed Howland
Matt, I was facinated to read the email thread on Cuke's wire protoccol. You guys collaborated well. I have been working on my own to develop a similar protocol for RSpec. It is totally external to RSpec right now and very primitive. Whereas with Cucumber, the step definitions are run on some ot