Andrew,
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>
>
> On 8 July 2010 11:46, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:24 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>>
>> On 8 July 2010 01:01, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi ther
On 8 July 2010 11:46, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:24 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>
> On 8 July 2010 01:01, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>>
>> > Hi there.
>> >
>> > My understanding (which is limited) is that rspec uses at_exit to r
On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:24 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> On 8 July 2010 01:01, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>
> > Hi there.
> >
> > My understanding (which is limited) is that rspec uses at_exit to run its
> > specs. I don't really know why - could somoen
On 8 July 2010 01:01, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>
> > Hi there.
> >
> > My understanding (which is limited) is that rspec uses at_exit to run its
> specs. I don't really know why - could somoene explain?
>
> The initial motivation was that it makes
On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> My understanding (which is limited) is that rspec uses at_exit to run its
> specs. I don't really know why - could somoene explain?
The initial motivation was that it makes it easy to make sure it works whether
you run it with t
Hi there.
My understanding (which is limited) is that rspec uses at_exit to run its
specs. I don't really know why - could somoene explain?
My problem with this behaviour is that I would like the running of a spec to
start an instance of solr (using Sunspot) if one is not running. The problem
wit
