+1 for ramaze. The gem also installs some lovely example apps and they
use rspec for their development, so there are plenty of example specs
both at the code and integration (web) level.
I've not been writing ruby web apps in anger but for all the little
example apps I write I've been using ramaze
Many thanks for the info, that certainly clarifies things!
~ Mark
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On 10 Sep 2008, at 23:21, Matt Wynne wrote:
With that one sentence, you have summed up all the painful bits of
my first five weeks on rails. Bring on merb :)
If you're doing something simple, try Ramaze[1] (although I will
investigate Merb in depth soon for a more significant project). I'
On 10 Sep 2008, at 19:49, Pat Maddox wrote:
except you can't simply do that, because ActionPack is a rat's nest of
dependencies.
With that one sentence, you have summed up all the painful bits of my
first five weeks on rails. Bring on merb :)
cheers,
Matt
http://blog.mattwynne.net
http
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Mark Dodwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that RSpec-Rails isn't restricted to the HTTP methods
> correctly.
>
> For example doing:
>
> http://foo.local/session/destroy
>
> in the browser doesn't work, because the destroy action is only
> recognised with
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Mark Dodwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that RSpec-Rails isn't restricted to the HTTP methods
> correctly.
>
> For example doing:
>
> http://foo.local/session/destroy
>
> in the browser doesn't work, because the destroy action is only
> recognised with
It seems that RSpec-Rails isn't restricted to the HTTP methods
correctly.
For example doing:
http://foo.local/session/destroy
in the browser doesn't work, because the destroy action is only
recognised with the HTTP 'delete' verb.
But in Rspec specs if you do:
get :destroy
It works.
Is t
